Claude Haiku 4.5 vs GLM-4.7-Flash Comparison

Comparing Claude Haiku 4.5 and GLM-4.7-Flash across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

3 benchmarks

Claude Haiku 4.5 outperforms in 1 benchmarks (SWE-Bench Verified), while GLM-4.7-Flash is better at 2 benchmarks (AIME 2025, GPQA).

GLM-4.7-Flash shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

Tue Mar 17 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

GLM-4.7-Flash costs less

For input processing, Claude Haiku 4.5 ($1.00/1M tokens) is 14.3x more expensive than GLM-4.7-Flash ($0.07/1M tokens).

For output processing, Claude Haiku 4.5 ($5.00/1M tokens) is 12.5x more expensive than GLM-4.7-Flash ($0.40/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Claude Haiku 4.5 is more expensive than GLM-4.7-Flash.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers

Tue Mar 17 2026 • llm-stats.com

Claude Haiku 4.5

Input tokens$1.00

Output tokens$5.00

Best providerAnthropic

GLM-4.7-Flash

Input tokens$0.07

Output tokens$0.40

Best providerUnknown Organization

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Claude Haiku 4.5 accepts 200,000 input tokens compared to GLM-4.7-Flash's 128,000 tokens. Claude Haiku 4.5 can generate longer responses up to 64,000 tokens, while GLM-4.7-Flash is limited to 16,384 tokens.

Claude Haiku 4.5

Input200,000 tokens

Output64,000 tokens

GLM-4.7-Flash

Input128,000 tokens

Output16,384 tokens

Tue Mar 17 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Claude Haiku 4.5 supports multimodal inputs, whereas GLM-4.7-Flash does not.

Claude Haiku 4.5 can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Claude Haiku 4.5

Text

Images

Audio

Video

GLM-4.7-Flash

Text

Images

Audio

Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Claude Haiku 4.5 is licensed under a proprietary license, while GLM-4.7-Flash uses MIT.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Claude Haiku 4.5

Proprietary

Closed source

GLM-4.7-Flash

MIT

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Claude Haiku 4.5 was released on 2025-10-15, while GLM-4.7-Flash was released on 2026-01-19.

GLM-4.7-Flash is 3 months newer than Claude Haiku 4.5.

Claude Haiku 4.5

Oct 15, 2025

5 months ago

GLM-4.7-Flash

Jan 19, 2026

1 months ago

3mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Claude Haiku 4.5 has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2025-02-01, while GLM-4.7-Flash's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Claude Haiku 4.5's training data extends to 2025-02-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without GLM-4.7-Flash's cutoff date.

Claude Haiku 4.5

Feb 2025

GLM-4.7-Flash

—

Provider Availability

Claude Haiku 4.5 is available from Anthropic. GLM-4.7-Flash is available from ZAI. The availability of providers can affect quality of the model and reliability.