Model Comparison

Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Llama 4 Scout

Claude Haiku 4.5 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Llama 4 Scout is 14.8x cheaper per token.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

1 benchmarks

Claude Haiku 4.5 outperforms in 1 benchmarks (GPQA), while Llama 4 Scout is better at 0 benchmarks.

Claude Haiku 4.5 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Fri May 29 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Llama 4 Scout costs less

For input processing, Claude Haiku 4.5 ($1.00/1M tokens) is 12.5x more expensive than Llama 4 Scout ($0.08/1M tokens).

For output processing, Claude Haiku 4.5 ($5.00/1M tokens) is 16.7x more expensive than Llama 4 Scout ($0.30/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Claude Haiku 4.5 is more expensive than Llama 4 Scout.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers

Fri May 29 2026 • llm-stats.com

Claude Haiku 4.5

Input tokens$1.00

Output tokens$5.00

Best providerAnthropic

Llama 4 Scout

Input tokens$0.08

Output tokens$0.30

Best providerDeepinfra

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Llama 4 Scout accepts 10,000,000 input tokens compared to Claude Haiku 4.5's 200,000 tokens. Llama 4 Scout can generate longer responses up to 10,000,000 tokens, while Claude Haiku 4.5 is limited to 64,000 tokens.

Claude Haiku 4.5

Input200,000 tokens

Output64,000 tokens

Llama 4 Scout

Input10,000,000 tokens

Output10,000,000 tokens

Fri May 29 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both Claude Haiku 4.5 and Llama 4 Scout support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Claude Haiku 4.5

Text

Images

Audio

Video

Llama 4 Scout

Text

Images

Audio

Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Claude Haiku 4.5 is licensed under a proprietary license, while Llama 4 Scout uses Llama 4 Community License Agreement.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Claude Haiku 4.5

Proprietary

Closed source

Llama 4 Scout

Llama 4 Community License Agreement

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Claude Haiku 4.5 was released on 2025-10-15, while Llama 4 Scout was released on 2025-04-05.

Claude Haiku 4.5 is 6 months newer than Llama 4 Scout.

Claude Haiku 4.5

Oct 15, 2025

7 months ago

6mo newer

Llama 4 Scout

Apr 5, 2025

1.1 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Claude Haiku 4.5 has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2025-02-01, while Llama 4 Scout's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Claude Haiku 4.5's training data extends to 2025-02-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Llama 4 Scout's cutoff date.

Claude Haiku 4.5

Feb 2025

Llama 4 Scout

—

Provider Availability

Claude Haiku 4.5 is available from Anthropic, Vertex AI. Llama 4 Scout is available from DeepInfra, Lambda, Novita, Groq, Fireworks, Together.

Claude Haiku 4.5

Anthropic

Input Price:Input: $1.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $5.00/1M

Unknown Organization

Input Price:Input: $1.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $5.00/1M

Llama 4 Scout

Deepinfra

Input Price:Input: $0.08/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.30/1M

Lambda

Input Price:Input: $0.08/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.30/1M

Novita

Input Price:Input: $0.10/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.50/1M

Groq

Input Price:Input: $0.11/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.34/1M

Fireworks

Input Price:Input: $0.15/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.60/1M

Together

Input Price:Input: $0.18/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.59/1M

* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Claude Haiku 4.5

View details

Anthropic

Higher GPQA score (73.0% vs 57.2%)

Llama 4 Scout

View details

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature	Claude Haiku 4.5	Llama 4 Scout

FAQ

Common questions about Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Llama 4 Scout.

Which is better, Claude Haiku 4.5 or Llama 4 Scout?

Claude Haiku 4.5 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Claude Haiku 4.5 is made by Anthropic and Llama 4 Scout is made by Meta. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Claude Haiku 4.5 compare to Llama 4 Scout in benchmarks?

Claude Haiku 4.5 scores Tau2 Retail: 83.2%, MMMLU: 83.0%, Tau2 Telecom: 83.0%, AIME 2025: 80.7%, SWE-Bench Verified: 73.3%. Llama 4 Scout scores DocVQA: 94.4%, MGSM: 90.6%, ChartQA: 88.8%, MMLU: 79.6%, MMLU-Pro: 74.3%.

Is Claude Haiku 4.5 cheaper than Llama 4 Scout?

Llama 4 Scout is 12.5x cheaper for input tokens. Claude Haiku 4.5 costs $1.00/M input and $5.00/M output via anthropic. Llama 4 Scout costs $0.08/M input and $0.30/M output via deepinfra.

What are the context window sizes for Claude Haiku 4.5 and Llama 4 Scout?

Claude Haiku 4.5 supports 200K tokens and Llama 4 Scout supports 10.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Claude Haiku 4.5 and Llama 4 Scout?

Key differences include context window (200K vs 10.0M), input pricing ($1.00 vs $0.08/M), licensing (Proprietary vs Llama 4 Community License Agreement). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Claude Haiku 4.5 and Llama 4 Scout?

Claude Haiku 4.5 is developed by Anthropic and Llama 4 Scout is developed by Meta.