Claude Haiku 4.5 vs LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601 Comparison

Comparing Claude Haiku 4.5 and LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601 across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

6 benchmarks

Claude Haiku 4.5 outperforms in 1 benchmarks (SWE-Bench Verified), while LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601 is better at 5 benchmarks (AIME 2025, GPQA, Tau2 Airline, Tau2 Retail, Tau2 Telecom).

LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Mon Mar 16 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601 costs less

For input processing, Claude Haiku 4.5 ($1.00/1M tokens) is 3.3x more expensive than LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601 ($0.30/1M tokens).

For output processing, Claude Haiku 4.5 ($5.00/1M tokens) is 4.2x more expensive than LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601 ($1.20/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Claude Haiku 4.5 is more expensive than LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Mon Mar 16 2026 • llm-stats.com
Anthropic
Claude Haiku 4.5
Input tokens$1.00
Output tokens$5.00
Best providerAnthropic
Meituan
LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601
Input tokens$0.30
Output tokens$1.20
Best providerMeituan
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Claude Haiku 4.5 accepts 200,000 input tokens compared to LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601's 128,000 tokens. LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601 can generate longer responses up to 128,000 tokens, while Claude Haiku 4.5 is limited to 64,000 tokens.

Anthropic
Claude Haiku 4.5
Input200,000 tokens
Output64,000 tokens
Meituan
LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601
Input128,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Mon Mar 16 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Claude Haiku 4.5 supports multimodal inputs, whereas LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601 does not.

Claude Haiku 4.5 can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Claude Haiku 4.5

Text
Images
Audio
Video

LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Claude Haiku 4.5 is licensed under a proprietary license, while LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601 uses MIT.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Claude Haiku 4.5

Proprietary

Closed source

LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601

MIT

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Claude Haiku 4.5 was released on 2025-10-15, while LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601 was released on 2026-01-14.

LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601 is 3 months newer than Claude Haiku 4.5.

Claude Haiku 4.5

Oct 15, 2025

5 months ago

LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601

Jan 14, 2026

2 months ago

3mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Claude Haiku 4.5 has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2025-02-01, while LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Claude Haiku 4.5's training data extends to 2025-02-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601's cutoff date.

Claude Haiku 4.5

Feb 2025

LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601

Provider Availability

Claude Haiku 4.5 is available from Anthropic. LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601 is available from Meituan. The availability of providers can affect quality of the model and reliability.

Claude Haiku 4.5

anthropic logo
Anthropic
Input Price:Input: $1.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $5.00/1M

LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601

meituan logo
Meituan
Input Price:Input: $0.30/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.20/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Key Takeaways

Larger context window (200,000 tokens)
Supports multimodal inputs
Higher SWE-Bench Verified score (73.3% vs 70.0%)
Less expensive input tokens
Less expensive output tokens
Has open weights
Higher AIME 2025 score (99.6% vs 80.7%)
Higher GPQA score (80.5% vs 73.0%)
Higher Tau2 Airline score (76.5% vs 63.6%)
Higher Tau2 Retail score (88.6% vs 83.2%)
Higher Tau2 Telecom score (99.3% vs 83.0%)

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Anthropic
Claude Haiku 4.5
Meituan
LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601