Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct Comparison
Comparing Claude Haiku 4.5 and Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.
Performance Benchmarks
Comparative analysis across standard metrics
Claude Haiku 4.5 outperforms in 2 benchmarks (GPQA, MMMLU), while Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct is better at 0 benchmarks.
Claude Haiku 4.5 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
Arena Performance
Human preference votes
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
Cost data unavailable.
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
Only Claude Haiku 4.5 specifies input context (200,000 tokens). Only Claude Haiku 4.5 specifies output context (64,000 tokens).
Input Capabilities
Supported data types and modalities
Claude Haiku 4.5 supports multimodal inputs, whereas Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct does not.
Claude Haiku 4.5 can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.
Claude Haiku 4.5
Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct
License
Usage and distribution terms
Claude Haiku 4.5 is licensed under a proprietary license, while Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct uses MIT.
License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.
Proprietary
Closed source
MIT
Open weights
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
Claude Haiku 4.5 was released on 2025-10-15, while Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct was released on 2024-08-23.
Claude Haiku 4.5 is 14 months newer than Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct.
Oct 15, 2025
5 months ago
1.1yr newerAug 23, 2024
1.6 years ago
Knowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Claude Haiku 4.5 has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2025-02-01, while Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct's cutoff date is not specified.
We can confirm Claude Haiku 4.5's training data extends to 2025-02-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct's cutoff date.
Feb 2025
—
Outputs Comparison
Key Takeaways
Claude Haiku 4.5
View detailsAnthropic
Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct
View detailsMicrosoft
Detailed Comparison
| Feature | | |
|---|