Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct Comparison

Comparing Claude Haiku 4.5 and Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

No common benchmarks found

Claude Haiku 4.5 and Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct don't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct costs less

For input processing, Claude Haiku 4.5 ($1.00/1M tokens) is 11.1x more expensive than Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct ($0.09/1M tokens).

For output processing, Claude Haiku 4.5 ($5.00/1M tokens) is 55.6x more expensive than Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct ($0.09/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Claude Haiku 4.5 is more expensive than Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers

Sat Mar 14 2026 • llm-stats.com

Claude Haiku 4.5

Input tokens$1.00

Output tokens$5.00

Best providerAnthropic

Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct

Input tokens$0.09

Output tokens$0.09

Best providerLambda

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Claude Haiku 4.5 accepts 200,000 input tokens compared to Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct's 128,000 tokens. Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct can generate longer responses up to 128,000 tokens, while Claude Haiku 4.5 is limited to 64,000 tokens.

Claude Haiku 4.5

Input200,000 tokens

Output64,000 tokens

Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct

Input128,000 tokens

Output128,000 tokens

Sat Mar 14 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Claude Haiku 4.5 supports multimodal inputs, whereas Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct does not.

Claude Haiku 4.5 can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Claude Haiku 4.5

Text

Images

Audio

Video

Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct

Text

Images

Audio

Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Claude Haiku 4.5 is licensed under a proprietary license, while Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Claude Haiku 4.5

Proprietary

Closed source

Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Claude Haiku 4.5 was released on 2025-10-15, while Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct was released on 2024-09-19.

Claude Haiku 4.5 is 13 months newer than Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct.

Claude Haiku 4.5

Oct 15, 2025

5 months ago

1.1yr newer

Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct

Sep 19, 2024

1.5 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Claude Haiku 4.5 has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2025-02-01, while Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Claude Haiku 4.5's training data extends to 2025-02-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct's cutoff date.

Claude Haiku 4.5

Feb 2025

Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct

—

Provider Availability

Claude Haiku 4.5 is available from Anthropic. Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct is available from Lambda, DeepInfra, Hyperbolic, Fireworks. The availability of providers can affect quality of the model and reliability.