Model Comparison

Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Qwen3-Coder

Comparing Claude Haiku 4.5 and Qwen3-Coder across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

No common benchmarks found

Claude Haiku 4.5 and Qwen3-Coder don't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Qwen3-Coder costs less

For input processing, Claude Haiku 4.5 ($1.00/1M tokens) is 5.6x more expensive than Qwen3-Coder ($0.18/1M tokens).

For output processing, Claude Haiku 4.5 ($5.00/1M tokens) is 27.8x more expensive than Qwen3-Coder ($0.18/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Claude Haiku 4.5 is more expensive than Qwen3-Coder.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Thu May 14 2026 • llm-stats.com
Anthropic
Claude Haiku 4.5
Input tokens$1.00
Output tokens$5.00
Best providerAnthropic
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3-Coder
Input tokens$0.18
Output tokens$0.18
Best providerDeepinfra
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Qwen3-Coder accepts 256,000 input tokens compared to Claude Haiku 4.5's 200,000 tokens. Qwen3-Coder can generate longer responses up to 256,000 tokens, while Claude Haiku 4.5 is limited to 64,000 tokens.

Anthropic
Claude Haiku 4.5
Input200,000 tokens
Output64,000 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3-Coder
Input256,000 tokens
Output256,000 tokens
Thu May 14 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Claude Haiku 4.5 supports multimodal inputs, whereas Qwen3-Coder does not.

Claude Haiku 4.5 can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Claude Haiku 4.5

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen3-Coder

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Claude Haiku 4.5 is licensed under a proprietary license, while Qwen3-Coder uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Claude Haiku 4.5

Proprietary

Closed source

Qwen3-Coder

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Claude Haiku 4.5 was released on 2025-10-15, while Qwen3-Coder was released on 2025-01-01.

Claude Haiku 4.5 is 10 months newer than Qwen3-Coder.

Claude Haiku 4.5

Oct 15, 2025

7 months ago

9mo newer
Qwen3-Coder

Jan 1, 2025

1.4 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Claude Haiku 4.5 has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2025-02-01, while Qwen3-Coder's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Claude Haiku 4.5's training data extends to 2025-02-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Qwen3-Coder's cutoff date.

Claude Haiku 4.5

Feb 2025

Qwen3-Coder

Provider Availability

Claude Haiku 4.5 is available from Anthropic. Qwen3-Coder is available from DeepInfra, Fireworks.

Claude Haiku 4.5

anthropic logo
Anthropic
Input Price:Input: $1.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $5.00/1M

Qwen3-Coder

deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.18/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.18/1M
fireworks logo
Fireworks
Input Price:Input: $0.25/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.25/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Key Takeaways

Supports multimodal inputs
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Qwen3-Coder

View details

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Larger context window (256,000 tokens)
Less expensive input tokens
Less expensive output tokens
Has open weights

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Anthropic
Claude Haiku 4.5
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3-Coder

FAQ

Common questions about Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Qwen3-Coder.

Which is better, Claude Haiku 4.5 or Qwen3-Coder?

Claude Haiku 4.5 (Anthropic) and Qwen3-Coder (Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team) each have strengths in different areas. Compare their benchmark scores, pricing, context windows, and capabilities above to determine which fits your needs.

How does Claude Haiku 4.5 compare to Qwen3-Coder in benchmarks?

Claude Haiku 4.5 scores Tau2 Retail: 83.2%, MMMLU: 83.0%, Tau2 Telecom: 83.0%, AIME 2025: 80.7%, SWE-Bench Verified: 73.3%.

Is Claude Haiku 4.5 cheaper than Qwen3-Coder?

Qwen3-Coder is 5.6x cheaper for input tokens. Claude Haiku 4.5 costs $1.00/M input and $5.00/M output via anthropic. Qwen3-Coder costs $0.18/M input and $0.18/M output via deepinfra.

What are the context window sizes for Claude Haiku 4.5 and Qwen3-Coder?

Claude Haiku 4.5 supports 200K tokens and Qwen3-Coder supports 256K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Claude Haiku 4.5 and Qwen3-Coder?

Key differences include context window (200K vs 256K), input pricing ($1.00 vs $0.18/M), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Claude Haiku 4.5 and Qwen3-Coder?

Claude Haiku 4.5 is developed by Anthropic and Qwen3-Coder is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.