Model Comparison

Qwen3.5-397B-A17B vs Claude Haiku 4.5

Qwen3.5-397B-A17B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Qwen3.5-397B-A17B is 1.5x cheaper per token.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

3 benchmarks

Qwen3.5-397B-A17B outperforms in 3 benchmarks (GPQA, MMMLU, SWE-Bench Verified), while Claude Haiku 4.5 is better at 0 benchmarks.

Qwen3.5-397B-A17B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Thu Apr 16 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Qwen3.5-397B-A17B costs less

For input processing, Qwen3.5-397B-A17B ($0.60/1M tokens) is 1.7x cheaper than Claude Haiku 4.5 ($1.00/1M tokens).

For output processing, Qwen3.5-397B-A17B ($3.60/1M tokens) is 1.4x cheaper than Claude Haiku 4.5 ($5.00/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Claude Haiku 4.5 is more expensive than Qwen3.5-397B-A17B.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Thu Apr 16 2026 • llm-stats.com
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
Input tokens$0.60
Output tokens$3.60
Best providerNovita
Anthropic
Claude Haiku 4.5
Input tokens$1.00
Output tokens$5.00
Best providerAnthropic
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Qwen3.5-397B-A17B accepts 262,144 input tokens compared to Claude Haiku 4.5's 200,000 tokens. Both models can generate responses up to 64,000 tokens.

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
Input262,144 tokens
Output64,000 tokens
Anthropic
Claude Haiku 4.5
Input200,000 tokens
Output64,000 tokens
Thu Apr 16 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both Qwen3.5-397B-A17B and Claude Haiku 4.5 support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Qwen3.5-397B-A17B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Claude Haiku 4.5

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Qwen3.5-397B-A17B is licensed under Apache 2.0, while Claude Haiku 4.5 uses a proprietary license.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Qwen3.5-397B-A17B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Claude Haiku 4.5

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Qwen3.5-397B-A17B was released on 2026-02-16, while Claude Haiku 4.5 was released on 2025-10-15.

Qwen3.5-397B-A17B is 4 months newer than Claude Haiku 4.5.

Qwen3.5-397B-A17B

Feb 16, 2026

1 months ago

4mo newer
Claude Haiku 4.5

Oct 15, 2025

6 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Claude Haiku 4.5 has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2025-02-01, while Qwen3.5-397B-A17B's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Claude Haiku 4.5's training data extends to 2025-02-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Qwen3.5-397B-A17B's cutoff date.

Qwen3.5-397B-A17B

—

Claude Haiku 4.5

Feb 2025

Provider Availability

Qwen3.5-397B-A17B is available from Novita. Claude Haiku 4.5 is available from Anthropic.

Qwen3.5-397B-A17B

novita logo
Novita
Input Price:Input: $0.60/1MOutput Price:Output: $3.60/1M

Claude Haiku 4.5

anthropic logo
Anthropic
Input Price:Input: $1.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $5.00/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Qwen3.5-397B-A17B

View details

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Larger context window (262,144 tokens)
Less expensive input tokens
Less expensive output tokens
Has open weights
Higher GPQA score (88.4% vs 73.0%)
Higher MMMLU score (88.5% vs 83.0%)
Higher SWE-Bench Verified score (76.4% vs 73.3%)
Anthropic

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
Anthropic
Claude Haiku 4.5

FAQ

Common questions about Qwen3.5-397B-A17B vs Claude Haiku 4.5

Qwen3.5-397B-A17B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Qwen3.5-397B-A17B is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team and Claude Haiku 4.5 is made by Anthropic. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.
Qwen3.5-397B-A17B scores MMLU-Redux: 94.9%, HMMT 2025: 94.8%, C-Eval: 93.0%, HMMT25: 92.7%, IFEval: 92.6%. Claude Haiku 4.5 scores Tau2 Retail: 83.2%, MMMLU: 83.0%, Tau2 Telecom: 83.0%, AIME 2025: 80.7%, SWE-Bench Verified: 73.3%.
Qwen3.5-397B-A17B is 1.7x cheaper for input tokens. Qwen3.5-397B-A17B costs $0.60/M input and $3.60/M output via novita. Claude Haiku 4.5 costs $1.00/M input and $5.00/M output via anthropic.
Qwen3.5-397B-A17B supports 262K tokens and Claude Haiku 4.5 supports 200K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.
Key differences include context window (262K vs 200K), input pricing ($0.60 vs $1.00/M), licensing (Apache 2.0 vs Proprietary). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.
Qwen3.5-397B-A17B is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team and Claude Haiku 4.5 is developed by Anthropic.