Model Comparison

Claude Opus 4.1 vs Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Claude Opus 4.1 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is 171.4x cheaper per token.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

3 benchmarks

Claude Opus 4.1 outperforms in 3 benchmarks (AIME 2025, GPQA, SWE-Bench Verified), while Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is better at 0 benchmarks.

Claude Opus 4.1 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Sat May 09 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite costs less

For input processing, Claude Opus 4.1 ($15.00/1M tokens) is 150.0x more expensive than Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite ($0.10/1M tokens).

For output processing, Claude Opus 4.1 ($75.00/1M tokens) is 187.5x more expensive than Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite ($0.40/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Claude Opus 4.1 is more expensive than Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers

Sat May 09 2026 • llm-stats.com

Claude Opus 4.1

Input tokens$15.00

Output tokens$75.00

Best providerAnthropic

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Input tokens$0.10

Output tokens$0.40

Best providerGoogle

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite accepts 1,048,576 input tokens compared to Claude Opus 4.1's 200,000 tokens. Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite can generate longer responses up to 65,536 tokens, while Claude Opus 4.1 is limited to 32,000 tokens.

Claude Opus 4.1

Input200,000 tokens

Output32,000 tokens

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Input1,048,576 tokens

Output65,536 tokens

Sat May 09 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both Claude Opus 4.1 and Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Claude Opus 4.1

Text

Images

Audio

Video

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Text

Images

Audio

Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Claude Opus 4.1 is licensed under a proprietary license, while Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite uses Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Claude Opus 4.1

Proprietary

Closed source

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Claude Opus 4.1 was released on 2025-08-05, while Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite was released on 2025-06-17.

Claude Opus 4.1 is 2 months newer than Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite.

Claude Opus 4.1

Aug 5, 2025

9 months ago

1mo newer

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Jun 17, 2025

10 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2025-01-01, while Claude Opus 4.1's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite's training data extends to 2025-01-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Claude Opus 4.1's cutoff date.

Claude Opus 4.1

—

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Jan 2025

Provider Availability

Claude Opus 4.1 is available from Anthropic, Bedrock, Google. Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is available from Google.

Claude Opus 4.1

Anthropic

Input Price:Input: $15.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $75.00/1M

AWS Bedrock

Input Price:Input: $15.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $75.00/1M

Google

Input Price:Input: $15.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $75.00/1M

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Google

Input Price:Input: $0.10/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.40/1M

* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Claude Opus 4.1

View details

Anthropic

Higher AIME 2025 score (78.0% vs 49.8%)

Higher GPQA score (80.9% vs 64.6%)

Higher SWE-Bench Verified score (74.5% vs 31.6%)

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

View details

Google

Larger context window (1,048,576 tokens)

Less expensive input tokens

Less expensive output tokens

Has open weights

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature	Claude Opus 4.1	Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

FAQ

Common questions about Claude Opus 4.1 vs Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite.

Which is better, Claude Opus 4.1 or Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite?

Claude Opus 4.1 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Claude Opus 4.1 is made by Anthropic and Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is made by Google. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Claude Opus 4.1 compare to Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite in benchmarks?

Claude Opus 4.1 scores MMMLU: 89.5%, TAU-bench Retail: 82.4%, GPQA: 80.9%, AIME 2025: 78.0%, MMMU (validation): 77.1%. Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite scores FACTS Grounding: 84.1%, Global-MMLU-Lite: 81.1%, MMMU: 72.9%, GPQA: 64.6%, Vibe-Eval: 51.3%.

Is Claude Opus 4.1 cheaper than Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite?

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is 150.0x cheaper for input tokens. Claude Opus 4.1 costs $15.00/M input and $75.00/M output via anthropic. Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite costs $0.10/M input and $0.40/M output via google.

What are the context window sizes for Claude Opus 4.1 and Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite?

Claude Opus 4.1 supports 200K tokens and Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite supports 1.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Claude Opus 4.1 and Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite?

Key differences include context window (200K vs 1.0M), input pricing ($15.00 vs $0.10/M), licensing (Proprietary vs Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Claude Opus 4.1 and Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite?

Claude Opus 4.1 is developed by Anthropic and Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is developed by Google.