Model Comparison

Claude Opus 4.1 vs GPT-4o mini

Claude Opus 4.1 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. GPT-4o mini is 114.3x cheaper per token.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

2 benchmarks

Claude Opus 4.1 outperforms in 2 benchmarks (GPQA, SWE-Bench Verified), while GPT-4o mini is better at 0 benchmarks.

Claude Opus 4.1 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Thu Apr 30 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

GPT-4o mini costs less

For input processing, Claude Opus 4.1 ($15.00/1M tokens) is 100.0x more expensive than GPT-4o mini ($0.15/1M tokens).

For output processing, Claude Opus 4.1 ($75.00/1M tokens) is 125.0x more expensive than GPT-4o mini ($0.60/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Claude Opus 4.1 is more expensive than GPT-4o mini.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Thu Apr 30 2026 • llm-stats.com
Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.1
Input tokens$15.00
Output tokens$75.00
Best providerAnthropic
OpenAI
GPT-4o mini
Input tokens$0.15
Output tokens$0.60
Best providerAzure
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Claude Opus 4.1 accepts 200,000 input tokens compared to GPT-4o mini's 128,000 tokens. Claude Opus 4.1 can generate longer responses up to 32,000 tokens, while GPT-4o mini is limited to 16,384 tokens.

Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.1
Input200,000 tokens
Output32,000 tokens
OpenAI
GPT-4o mini
Input128,000 tokens
Output16,384 tokens
Thu Apr 30 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both Claude Opus 4.1 and GPT-4o mini support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Claude Opus 4.1

Text
Images
Audio
Video

GPT-4o mini

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Claude Opus 4.1

Proprietary

Closed source

GPT-4o mini

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Claude Opus 4.1 was released on 2025-08-05, while GPT-4o mini was released on 2024-07-18.

Claude Opus 4.1 is 13 months newer than GPT-4o mini.

Claude Opus 4.1

Aug 5, 2025

8 months ago

1.0yr newer
GPT-4o mini

Jul 18, 2024

1.8 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

GPT-4o mini has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2023-10-01, while Claude Opus 4.1's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm GPT-4o mini's training data extends to 2023-10-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Claude Opus 4.1's cutoff date.

Claude Opus 4.1

—

GPT-4o mini

Oct 2023

Provider Availability

Claude Opus 4.1 is available from Anthropic, Bedrock, Google. GPT-4o mini is available from Azure.

Claude Opus 4.1

anthropic logo
Anthropic
Input Price:Input: $15.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $75.00/1M
bedrock logo
AWS Bedrock
Input Price:Input: $15.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $75.00/1M
google logo
Google
Input Price:Input: $15.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $75.00/1M

GPT-4o mini

azure logo
Azure
Input Price:Input: $0.15/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.60/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Anthropic
Larger context window (200,000 tokens)
Higher GPQA score (80.9% vs 40.2%)
Higher SWE-Bench Verified score (74.5% vs 8.7%)
OpenAI
Less expensive input tokens
Less expensive output tokens

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.1
OpenAI
GPT-4o mini

FAQ

Common questions about Claude Opus 4.1 vs GPT-4o mini

Claude Opus 4.1 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Claude Opus 4.1 is made by Anthropic and GPT-4o mini is made by OpenAI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.
Claude Opus 4.1 scores MMMLU: 89.5%, TAU-bench Retail: 82.4%, GPQA: 80.9%, AIME 2025: 78.0%, MMMU (validation): 77.1%. GPT-4o mini scores HumanEval: 87.2%, MGSM: 87.0%, MMLU: 82.0%, DROP: 79.7%, MATH: 70.2%.
GPT-4o mini is 100.0x cheaper for input tokens. Claude Opus 4.1 costs $15.00/M input and $75.00/M output via anthropic. GPT-4o mini costs $0.15/M input and $0.60/M output via azure.
Claude Opus 4.1 supports 200K tokens and GPT-4o mini supports 128K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.
Key differences include context window (200K vs 128K), input pricing ($15.00 vs $0.15/M). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.
Claude Opus 4.1 is developed by Anthropic and GPT-4o mini is developed by OpenAI.