Claude Opus 4.1 vs GPT OSS 120B High
Claude Opus 4.1 and GPT OSS 120B High are closely matched at 29.8 and 25.4 on the LLM Stats Score. GPT OSS 120B High is 150.0x cheaper per token.
Anthropic · OpenAI · Updated for 2026
Which is better?
Claude Opus 4.1 and GPT OSS 120B High are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at 29.8 and 25.4.
In the 3 individual benchmarks reported for both models, GPT OSS 120B High wins 2; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.
On price, GPT OSS 120B High is roughly 150.0x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.
Claude Opus 4.1 also accepts a larger context window (200,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.
Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.
Choose Claude Opus 4.1
- you process long inputs — it offers a 200,000 token context window
Choose GPT OSS 120B High
- you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 2 of 3 exact shared results
- cost matters — it's about 150.0x cheaper per token
- you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune
At a glance
The differences that matter most.
Capability indexes
Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks
Individual benchmarks
8 reported for Claude Opus 4.1 · 7 for GPT OSS 120B High
Claude Opus 4.1 outperforms in 1 benchmarks (MMMLU), while GPT OSS 120B High is better at 1 benchmark (AIME 2025).
Both models are evenly matched across the benchmarks.
Human preference
Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
For input processing, Claude Opus 4.1 ($15.00/1M tokens) is 150.0x more expensive than GPT OSS 120B High ($0.10/1M tokens).
For output processing, Claude Opus 4.1 ($75.00/1M tokens) is 150.0x more expensive than GPT OSS 120B High ($0.50/1M tokens).
In conclusion, Claude Opus 4.1 is more expensive than GPT OSS 120B High.*
* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
Claude Opus 4.1 accepts 200,000 input tokens compared to GPT OSS 120B High's 131,072 tokens. GPT OSS 120B High can generate longer responses up to 131,072 tokens, while Claude Opus 4.1 is limited to 32,000 tokens.
Input capabilities
Documented input modalities across available providers
Claude Opus 4.1 supports multimodal inputs, whereas GPT OSS 120B High does not.
Claude Opus 4.1 can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.
Claude Opus 4.1
GPT OSS 120B High
License
Usage and distribution terms
Claude Opus 4.1 is licensed under a proprietary license, while GPT OSS 120B High uses Apache 2.0.
License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.
Proprietary
Closed source
Apache 2.0
Open weights
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
Both models were released on 2025-08-05.
They likely represent similar generations of model development.
Aug 5, 2025
1.2 years ago
Aug 5, 2025
1.2 years ago
Knowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.
Unable to compare the recency of their training data.
Provider Availability
Claude Opus 4.1 is available from Anthropic, Bedrock, Google. GPT OSS 120B High is available from OpenAI, Fireworks.
Claude Opus 4.1
GPT OSS 120B High
Outputs Comparison
Judge for yourself.
Run your own prompts against Claude Opus 4.1 and GPT OSS 120B High side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.
FAQ
Common questions about Claude Opus 4.1 vs GPT OSS 120B High.