Model Comparison

Claude Opus 4.1 vs Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct

Comparing Claude Opus 4.1 and Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

No common benchmarks found

Claude Opus 4.1 and Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct don't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Claude Opus 4.1 specifies input context (200,000 tokens). Only Claude Opus 4.1 specifies output context (32,000 tokens).

Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.1
Input200,000 tokens
Output32,000 tokens
NVIDIA
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Tue May 26 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Claude Opus 4.1 supports multimodal inputs, whereas Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct does not.

Claude Opus 4.1 can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Claude Opus 4.1

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Claude Opus 4.1 is licensed under a proprietary license, while Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct uses Llama 3.1 Community License.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Claude Opus 4.1

Proprietary

Closed source

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct

Llama 3.1 Community License

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Claude Opus 4.1 was released on 2025-08-05, while Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct was released on 2024-10-01.

Claude Opus 4.1 is 10 months newer than Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct.

Claude Opus 4.1

Aug 5, 2025

9 months ago

10mo newer
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct

Oct 1, 2024

1.6 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2023-12-01, while Claude Opus 4.1's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct's training data extends to 2023-12-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Claude Opus 4.1's cutoff date.

Claude Opus 4.1

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct

Dec 2023

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Key Takeaways

Larger context window (200,000 tokens)
Supports multimodal inputs

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.1
NVIDIA
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct

FAQ

Common questions about Claude Opus 4.1 vs Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct.

Which is better, Claude Opus 4.1 or Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct?

Claude Opus 4.1 (Anthropic) and Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct (NVIDIA) each have strengths in different areas. Compare their benchmark scores, pricing, context windows, and capabilities above to determine which fits your needs.

How does Claude Opus 4.1 compare to Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct in benchmarks?

Claude Opus 4.1 scores MMMLU: 89.5%, TAU-bench Retail: 82.4%, GPQA: 80.9%, AIME 2025: 78.0%, MMMU (validation): 77.1%. Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct scores GSM8k: 91.4%, HellaSwag: 85.6%, Winogrande: 84.5%, GSM8K Chat: 81.9%, MMLU Chat: 80.6%.

What are the context window sizes for Claude Opus 4.1 and Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct?

Claude Opus 4.1 supports 200K tokens and Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Claude Opus 4.1 and Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct?

Key differences include multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Proprietary vs Llama 3.1 Community License). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Claude Opus 4.1 and Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct?

Claude Opus 4.1 is developed by Anthropic and Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct is developed by NVIDIA.