Model Comparison

Claude Opus 4.1 vs Llama 4 Scout

Claude Opus 4.1 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Llama 4 Scout is 222.2x cheaper per token.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

1 benchmarks

Claude Opus 4.1 outperforms in 1 benchmarks (GPQA), while Llama 4 Scout is better at 0 benchmarks.

Claude Opus 4.1 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Sat May 30 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Llama 4 Scout costs less

For input processing, Claude Opus 4.1 ($15.00/1M tokens) is 187.5x more expensive than Llama 4 Scout ($0.08/1M tokens).

For output processing, Claude Opus 4.1 ($75.00/1M tokens) is 250.0x more expensive than Llama 4 Scout ($0.30/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Claude Opus 4.1 is more expensive than Llama 4 Scout.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers

Sat May 30 2026 • llm-stats.com

Claude Opus 4.1

Input tokens$15.00

Output tokens$75.00

Best providerAnthropic

Llama 4 Scout

Input tokens$0.08

Output tokens$0.30

Best providerDeepinfra

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Llama 4 Scout accepts 10,000,000 input tokens compared to Claude Opus 4.1's 200,000 tokens. Llama 4 Scout can generate longer responses up to 10,000,000 tokens, while Claude Opus 4.1 is limited to 32,000 tokens.

Claude Opus 4.1

Input200,000 tokens

Output32,000 tokens

Llama 4 Scout

Input10,000,000 tokens

Output10,000,000 tokens

Sat May 30 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both Claude Opus 4.1 and Llama 4 Scout support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Claude Opus 4.1

Text

Images

Audio

Video

Llama 4 Scout

Text

Images

Audio

Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Claude Opus 4.1 is licensed under a proprietary license, while Llama 4 Scout uses Llama 4 Community License Agreement.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Claude Opus 4.1

Proprietary

Closed source

Llama 4 Scout

Llama 4 Community License Agreement

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Claude Opus 4.1 was released on 2025-08-05, while Llama 4 Scout was released on 2025-04-05.

Claude Opus 4.1 is 4 months newer than Llama 4 Scout.

Claude Opus 4.1

Aug 5, 2025

9 months ago

4mo newer

Llama 4 Scout

Apr 5, 2025

1.2 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

Claude Opus 4.1 is available from Anthropic, Bedrock, Google. Llama 4 Scout is available from DeepInfra, Lambda, Novita, Groq, Fireworks, Together.

Claude Opus 4.1

Anthropic

Input Price:Input: $15.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $75.00/1M

AWS Bedrock

Input Price:Input: $15.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $75.00/1M

Google

Input Price:Input: $15.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $75.00/1M

Llama 4 Scout

Deepinfra

Input Price:Input: $0.08/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.30/1M

Lambda

Input Price:Input: $0.08/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.30/1M

Novita

Input Price:Input: $0.10/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.50/1M

Groq

Input Price:Input: $0.11/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.34/1M

Fireworks

Input Price:Input: $0.15/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.60/1M

Together

Input Price:Input: $0.18/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.59/1M

* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Claude Opus 4.1

View details

Anthropic

Higher GPQA score (80.9% vs 57.2%)

Llama 4 Scout

View details

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature	Claude Opus 4.1	Llama 4 Scout

FAQ

Common questions about Claude Opus 4.1 vs Llama 4 Scout.

Which is better, Claude Opus 4.1 or Llama 4 Scout?

Claude Opus 4.1 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Claude Opus 4.1 is made by Anthropic and Llama 4 Scout is made by Meta. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Claude Opus 4.1 compare to Llama 4 Scout in benchmarks?

Claude Opus 4.1 scores MMMLU: 89.5%, TAU-bench Retail: 82.4%, GPQA: 80.9%, AIME 2025: 78.0%, MMMU (validation): 77.1%. Llama 4 Scout scores DocVQA: 94.4%, MGSM: 90.6%, ChartQA: 88.8%, MMLU: 79.6%, MMLU-Pro: 74.3%.

Is Claude Opus 4.1 cheaper than Llama 4 Scout?

Llama 4 Scout is 187.5x cheaper for input tokens. Claude Opus 4.1 costs $15.00/M input and $75.00/M output via anthropic. Llama 4 Scout costs $0.08/M input and $0.30/M output via deepinfra.

What are the context window sizes for Claude Opus 4.1 and Llama 4 Scout?

Claude Opus 4.1 supports 200K tokens and Llama 4 Scout supports 10.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Claude Opus 4.1 and Llama 4 Scout?

Key differences include context window (200K vs 10.0M), input pricing ($15.00 vs $0.08/M), licensing (Proprietary vs Llama 4 Community License Agreement). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Claude Opus 4.1 and Llama 4 Scout?

Claude Opus 4.1 is developed by Anthropic and Llama 4 Scout is developed by Meta.