Model Comparison

Claude Opus 4.1 vs Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct

Claude Opus 4.1 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct is 342.9x cheaper per token.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

1 benchmarks

Claude Opus 4.1 outperforms in 1 benchmarks (GPQA), while Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct is better at 0 benchmarks.

Claude Opus 4.1 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Sat May 09 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct costs less

For input processing, Claude Opus 4.1 ($15.00/1M tokens) is 214.3x more expensive than Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct ($0.07/1M tokens).

For output processing, Claude Opus 4.1 ($75.00/1M tokens) is 535.7x more expensive than Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct ($0.14/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Claude Opus 4.1 is more expensive than Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers

Sat May 09 2026 • llm-stats.com

Claude Opus 4.1

Input tokens$15.00

Output tokens$75.00

Best providerAnthropic

Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct

Input tokens$0.07

Output tokens$0.14

Best providerDeepinfra

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Claude Opus 4.1 accepts 200,000 input tokens compared to Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct's 32,000 tokens. Both models can generate responses up to 32,000 tokens.

Claude Opus 4.1

Input200,000 tokens

Output32,000 tokens

Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct

Input32,000 tokens

Output32,000 tokens

Sat May 09 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Claude Opus 4.1 supports multimodal inputs, whereas Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct does not.

Claude Opus 4.1 can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Claude Opus 4.1

Text

Images

Audio

Video

Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct

Text

Images

Audio

Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Claude Opus 4.1 is licensed under a proprietary license, while Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Claude Opus 4.1

Proprietary

Closed source

Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Claude Opus 4.1 was released on 2025-08-05, while Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct was released on 2025-01-30.

Claude Opus 4.1 is 6 months newer than Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct.

Claude Opus 4.1

Aug 5, 2025

9 months ago

6mo newer

Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct

Jan 30, 2025

1.3 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2023-10-01, while Claude Opus 4.1's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct's training data extends to 2023-10-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Claude Opus 4.1's cutoff date.

Claude Opus 4.1

—

Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct

Oct 2023

Provider Availability

Claude Opus 4.1 is available from Anthropic, Bedrock, Google. Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct is available from DeepInfra, Mistral AI.

Claude Opus 4.1

Anthropic

Input Price:Input: $15.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $75.00/1M

AWS Bedrock

Input Price:Input: $15.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $75.00/1M

Google

Input Price:Input: $15.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $75.00/1M

Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct

Deepinfra

Input Price:Input: $0.07/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.14/1M

Mistral

Input Price:Input: $0.10/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.30/1M

* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Claude Opus 4.1

View details

Anthropic

Larger context window (200,000 tokens)

Supports multimodal inputs

Higher GPQA score (80.9% vs 45.3%)

Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct

View details

Mistral AI

Less expensive input tokens

Less expensive output tokens

Has open weights

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature	Claude Opus 4.1	Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct

FAQ

Common questions about Claude Opus 4.1 vs Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct.

Which is better, Claude Opus 4.1 or Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct?

Claude Opus 4.1 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Claude Opus 4.1 is made by Anthropic and Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct is made by Mistral AI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Claude Opus 4.1 compare to Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct in benchmarks?

Claude Opus 4.1 scores MMMLU: 89.5%, TAU-bench Retail: 82.4%, GPQA: 80.9%, AIME 2025: 78.0%, MMMU (validation): 77.1%. Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct scores Arena Hard: 87.6%, HumanEval: 84.8%, MT-Bench: 83.5%, IFEval: 82.9%, MATH: 70.6%.

Is Claude Opus 4.1 cheaper than Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct?

Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct is 214.3x cheaper for input tokens. Claude Opus 4.1 costs $15.00/M input and $75.00/M output via anthropic. Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct costs $0.07/M input and $0.14/M output via deepinfra.

What are the context window sizes for Claude Opus 4.1 and Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct?

Claude Opus 4.1 supports 200K tokens and Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct supports 32K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Claude Opus 4.1 and Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct?

Key differences include context window (200K vs 32K), input pricing ($15.00 vs $0.07/M), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Claude Opus 4.1 and Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct?

Claude Opus 4.1 is developed by Anthropic and Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct is developed by Mistral AI.