Model Comparison

Claude Opus 4.1 vs Qwen3 VL 32B ThinkingWhich is better in 2026?

Both models are evenly matched across the benchmarks.

Verdict: Claude Opus 4.1 vs Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking — which is better?

Claude Opus 4.1 (by Anthropic) and Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking (by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

Claude Opus 4.1 outperforms in 1 benchmarks (GPQA), while Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking is better at 1 benchmark (AIME 2025). Both models are evenly matched across the benchmarks.

Choose Claude Opus 4.1 if…

  • you want predictable pricing at $15.00/M input and $75.00/M output

Choose Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking if…

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2025
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

2 benchmarks

Claude Opus 4.1 outperforms in 1 benchmarks (GPQA), while Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking is better at 1 benchmark (AIME 2025).

Both models are evenly matched across the benchmarks.

Fri Jun 26 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Claude Opus 4.1 specifies input context (200,000 tokens). Only Claude Opus 4.1 specifies output context (32,000 tokens).

Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.1
Input200,000 tokens
Output32,000 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Fri Jun 26 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both Claude Opus 4.1 and Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Claude Opus 4.1

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Claude Opus 4.1 is licensed under a proprietary license, while Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Claude Opus 4.1

Proprietary

Closed source

Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Claude Opus 4.1 was released on 2025-08-05, while Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking was released on 2025-09-22.

Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking is 2 months newer than Claude Opus 4.1.

Claude Opus 4.1

Aug 5, 2025

10 months ago

Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking

Sep 22, 2025

9 months ago

1mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Anthropic
Larger context window (200,000 tokens)
Higher GPQA score (80.9% vs 73.1%)
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking

View details

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Has open weights
Higher AIME 2025 score (83.7% vs 78.0%)

Detailed Comparison

Interactive Arena

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Claude Opus 4.1 and Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Claude Opus 4.1
✓ Preferred
Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking
Open in Playground
AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.1
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking

FAQ

Common questions about Claude Opus 4.1 vs Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking.

Which is better, Claude Opus 4.1 or Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking?

Both models are evenly matched across the benchmarks. Claude Opus 4.1 is made by Anthropic and Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Claude Opus 4.1 compare to Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking in benchmarks?

Claude Opus 4.1 scores MMMLU: 89.5%, TAU-bench Retail: 82.4%, GPQA: 80.9%, AIME 2025: 78.0%, MMMU (validation): 77.1%. Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking scores DocVQAtest: 96.1%, ScreenSpot: 95.7%, MMLU-Redux: 91.9%, MMBench-V1.1: 90.8%, CharXiv-D: 90.2%.

What are the context window sizes for Claude Opus 4.1 and Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking?

Claude Opus 4.1 supports 200K tokens and Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Claude Opus 4.1 and Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking?

Key differences include licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Claude Opus 4.1 and Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking?

Claude Opus 4.1 is developed by Anthropic and Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.

Related comparisons