Model Comparison

Claude Opus 4 vs Gemma 3n E4B Instructed

Claude Opus 4 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Gemma 3n E4B Instructed is 1.2x cheaper per token.

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

2 benchmarks

Claude Opus 4 outperforms in 2 benchmarks (AIME 2025, GPQA), while Gemma 3n E4B Instructed is better at 0 benchmarks.

Claude Opus 4 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Sat Apr 11 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed costs less

For input processing, Claude Opus 4 ($15.00/1M tokens) is 1.3x cheaper than Gemma 3n E4B Instructed ($20.00/1M tokens).

For output processing, Claude Opus 4 ($75.00/1M tokens) is 1.9x more expensive than Gemma 3n E4B Instructed ($40.00/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Claude Opus 4 is more expensive than Gemma 3n E4B Instructed.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Sat Apr 11 2026 • llm-stats.com
Anthropic
Claude Opus 4
Input tokens$15.00
Output tokens$75.00
Best providerAnthropic
Google
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
Input tokens$20.00
Output tokens$40.00
Best providerTogether
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Claude Opus 4 accepts 200,000 input tokens compared to Gemma 3n E4B Instructed's 32,000 tokens. Both models can generate responses up to 32,000 tokens.

Anthropic
Claude Opus 4
Input200,000 tokens
Output32,000 tokens
Google
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
Input32,000 tokens
Output32,000 tokens
Sat Apr 11 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both Claude Opus 4 and Gemma 3n E4B Instructed support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Claude Opus 4

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Claude Opus 4

Proprietary

Closed source

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Claude Opus 4 was released on 2025-05-22, while Gemma 3n E4B Instructed was released on 2025-06-26.

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed is 1 month newer than Claude Opus 4.

Claude Opus 4

May 22, 2025

10 months ago

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed

Jun 26, 2025

9 months ago

1mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-06-01, while Claude Opus 4's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemma 3n E4B Instructed's training data extends to 2024-06-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Claude Opus 4's cutoff date.

Claude Opus 4

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed

Jun 2024

Provider Availability

Claude Opus 4 is available from Anthropic, Bedrock, Google. Gemma 3n E4B Instructed is available from Together.

Claude Opus 4

anthropic logo
Anthropic
Input Price:Input: $15.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $75.00/1M
bedrock logo
AWS Bedrock
Input Price:Input: $15.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $75.00/1M
google logo
Google
Input Price:Input: $15.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $75.00/1M

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed

together logo
Together
Input Price:Input: $20.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $40.00/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Key Takeaways

Larger context window (200,000 tokens)
Less expensive input tokens
Higher AIME 2025 score (75.5% vs 11.6%)
Higher GPQA score (79.6% vs 23.7%)
Less expensive output tokens
AnthropicClaude Opus 4
GoogleGemma 3n E4B Instructed

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Anthropic
Claude Opus 4
Google
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed

FAQ

Common questions about Claude Opus 4 vs Gemma 3n E4B Instructed

Claude Opus 4 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Claude Opus 4 is made by Anthropic and Gemma 3n E4B Instructed is made by Google. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.
Claude Opus 4 scores MMMLU: 88.8%, TAU-bench Retail: 81.4%, GPQA: 79.6%, MMMU (validation): 76.5%, AIME 2025: 75.5%. Gemma 3n E4B Instructed scores HumanEval: 75.0%, MGSM: 67.0%, MMLU: 64.9%, Global-MMLU-Lite: 64.5%, MBPP: 63.6%.
Claude Opus 4 is 1.3x cheaper for input tokens. Claude Opus 4 costs $15.00/M input and $75.00/M output via anthropic. Gemma 3n E4B Instructed costs $20.00/M input and $40.00/M output via together.
Claude Opus 4 supports 200K tokens and Gemma 3n E4B Instructed supports 32K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.
Key differences include context window (200K vs 32K), input pricing ($15.00 vs $20.00/M). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.
Claude Opus 4 is developed by Anthropic and Gemma 3n E4B Instructed is developed by Google.