Model Comparison

Claude Opus 4 vs GPT-4o

Claude Opus 4 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. GPT-4o is 6.9x cheaper per token.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

1 benchmarks

Claude Opus 4 outperforms in 1 benchmarks (GPQA), while GPT-4o is better at 0 benchmarks.

Claude Opus 4 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Thu Apr 30 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

GPT-4o costs less

For input processing, Claude Opus 4 ($15.00/1M tokens) is 6.0x more expensive than GPT-4o ($2.50/1M tokens).

For output processing, Claude Opus 4 ($75.00/1M tokens) is 7.5x more expensive than GPT-4o ($10.00/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Claude Opus 4 is more expensive than GPT-4o.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Thu Apr 30 2026 • llm-stats.com
Anthropic
Claude Opus 4
Input tokens$15.00
Output tokens$75.00
Best providerAnthropic
OpenAI
GPT-4o
Input tokens$2.50
Output tokens$10.00
Best providerAzure
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Claude Opus 4 accepts 200,000 input tokens compared to GPT-4o's 128,000 tokens. Claude Opus 4 can generate longer responses up to 32,000 tokens, while GPT-4o is limited to 4,096 tokens.

Anthropic
Claude Opus 4
Input200,000 tokens
Output32,000 tokens
OpenAI
GPT-4o
Input128,000 tokens
Output4,096 tokens
Thu Apr 30 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both Claude Opus 4 and GPT-4o support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Claude Opus 4

Text
Images
Audio
Video

GPT-4o

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Claude Opus 4

Proprietary

Closed source

GPT-4o

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Claude Opus 4 was released on 2025-05-22, while GPT-4o was released on 2024-05-13.

Claude Opus 4 is 12 months newer than GPT-4o.

Claude Opus 4

May 22, 2025

11 months ago

1.0yr newer
GPT-4o

May 13, 2024

2.0 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

Claude Opus 4 is available from Anthropic, Bedrock, Google. GPT-4o is available from Azure, OpenAI.

Claude Opus 4

anthropic logo
Anthropic
Input Price:Input: $15.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $75.00/1M
bedrock logo
AWS Bedrock
Input Price:Input: $15.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $75.00/1M
google logo
Google
Input Price:Input: $15.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $75.00/1M

GPT-4o

azure logo
Azure
Input Price:Input: $2.50/1MOutput Price:Output: $10.00/1M
openai logo
OpenAI
Input Price:Input: $2.50/1MOutput Price:Output: $10.00/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Anthropic
Larger context window (200,000 tokens)
Higher GPQA score (79.6% vs 53.6%)
OpenAI
Less expensive input tokens
Less expensive output tokens
AnthropicClaude Opus 4
OpenAIGPT-4o
Compare in Playground

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Anthropic
Claude Opus 4
OpenAI
GPT-4o

FAQ

Common questions about Claude Opus 4 vs GPT-4o

Claude Opus 4 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Claude Opus 4 is made by Anthropic and GPT-4o is made by OpenAI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.
Claude Opus 4 scores MMMLU: 88.8%, TAU-bench Retail: 81.4%, GPQA: 79.6%, MMMU (validation): 76.5%, AIME 2025: 75.5%. GPT-4o scores MGSM: 90.5%, HumanEval: 90.2%, MMLU: 88.7%, DROP: 83.4%, MATH: 76.6%.
GPT-4o is 6.0x cheaper for input tokens. Claude Opus 4 costs $15.00/M input and $75.00/M output via anthropic. GPT-4o costs $2.50/M input and $10.00/M output via azure.
Claude Opus 4 supports 200K tokens and GPT-4o supports 128K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.
Key differences include context window (200K vs 128K), input pricing ($15.00 vs $2.50/M). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.
Claude Opus 4 is developed by Anthropic and GPT-4o is developed by OpenAI.