Model Comparison

Claude Opus 4 vs MiMo-V2-Flash

MiMo-V2-Flash shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks. MiMo-V2-Flash is 200.0x cheaper per token.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

4 benchmarks

Claude Opus 4 outperforms in 1 benchmarks (Terminal-Bench), while MiMo-V2-Flash is better at 3 benchmarks (AIME 2025, GPQA, SWE-Bench Verified).

MiMo-V2-Flash shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

Fri Apr 17 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

MiMo-V2-Flash costs less

For input processing, Claude Opus 4 ($15.00/1M tokens) is 150.0x more expensive than MiMo-V2-Flash ($0.10/1M tokens).

For output processing, Claude Opus 4 ($75.00/1M tokens) is 250.0x more expensive than MiMo-V2-Flash ($0.30/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Claude Opus 4 is more expensive than MiMo-V2-Flash.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Fri Apr 17 2026 • llm-stats.com
Anthropic
Claude Opus 4
Input tokens$15.00
Output tokens$75.00
Best providerAnthropic
Xiaomi
MiMo-V2-Flash
Input tokens$0.10
Output tokens$0.30
Best providerXiaomi
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

MiMo-V2-Flash accepts 256,000 input tokens compared to Claude Opus 4's 200,000 tokens. Claude Opus 4 can generate longer responses up to 32,000 tokens, while MiMo-V2-Flash is limited to 16,384 tokens.

Anthropic
Claude Opus 4
Input200,000 tokens
Output32,000 tokens
Xiaomi
MiMo-V2-Flash
Input256,000 tokens
Output16,384 tokens
Fri Apr 17 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Claude Opus 4 supports multimodal inputs, whereas MiMo-V2-Flash does not.

Claude Opus 4 can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Claude Opus 4

Text
Images
Audio
Video

MiMo-V2-Flash

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Claude Opus 4 is licensed under a proprietary license, while MiMo-V2-Flash uses MIT.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Claude Opus 4

Proprietary

Closed source

MiMo-V2-Flash

MIT

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Claude Opus 4 was released on 2025-05-22, while MiMo-V2-Flash was released on 2025-12-16.

MiMo-V2-Flash is 7 months newer than Claude Opus 4.

Claude Opus 4

May 22, 2025

11 months ago

MiMo-V2-Flash

Dec 16, 2025

4 months ago

6mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

Claude Opus 4 is available from Anthropic, Bedrock, Google. MiMo-V2-Flash is available from Xiaomi.

Claude Opus 4

anthropic logo
Anthropic
Input Price:Input: $15.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $75.00/1M
bedrock logo
AWS Bedrock
Input Price:Input: $15.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $75.00/1M
google logo
Google
Input Price:Input: $15.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $75.00/1M

MiMo-V2-Flash

xiaomi logo
Xiaomi
Input Price:Input: $0.10/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.30/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Anthropic
Supports multimodal inputs
Higher Terminal-Bench score (39.2% vs 30.5%)
Xiaomi
Larger context window (256,000 tokens)
Less expensive input tokens
Less expensive output tokens
Has open weights
Higher AIME 2025 score (94.1% vs 75.5%)
Higher GPQA score (83.7% vs 79.6%)
Higher SWE-Bench Verified score (73.4% vs 72.5%)
AnthropicClaude Opus 4
XiaomiMiMo-V2-Flash
Compare in Playground

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Anthropic
Claude Opus 4
Xiaomi
MiMo-V2-Flash

FAQ

Common questions about Claude Opus 4 vs MiMo-V2-Flash

MiMo-V2-Flash shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks. Claude Opus 4 is made by Anthropic and MiMo-V2-Flash is made by Xiaomi. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.
Claude Opus 4 scores MMMLU: 88.8%, TAU-bench Retail: 81.4%, GPQA: 79.6%, MMMU (validation): 76.5%, AIME 2025: 75.5%. MiMo-V2-Flash scores AIME 2025: 94.1%, Arena-Hard v2: 86.2%, MMLU-Pro: 84.9%, HMMT 2025: 84.4%, GPQA: 83.7%.
MiMo-V2-Flash is 150.0x cheaper for input tokens. Claude Opus 4 costs $15.00/M input and $75.00/M output via anthropic. MiMo-V2-Flash costs $0.10/M input and $0.30/M output via xiaomi.
Claude Opus 4 supports 200K tokens and MiMo-V2-Flash supports 256K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.
Key differences include context window (200K vs 256K), input pricing ($15.00 vs $0.10/M), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Proprietary vs MIT). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.
Claude Opus 4 is developed by Anthropic and MiMo-V2-Flash is developed by Xiaomi.