Model Comparison

Claude Opus 4 vs Qwen2.5 7B Instruct

Claude Opus 4 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Qwen2.5 7B Instruct is 100.0x cheaper per token.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

1 benchmarks

Claude Opus 4 outperforms in 1 benchmarks (GPQA), while Qwen2.5 7B Instruct is better at 0 benchmarks.

Claude Opus 4 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Thu May 14 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Qwen2.5 7B Instruct costs less

For input processing, Claude Opus 4 ($15.00/1M tokens) is 50.0x more expensive than Qwen2.5 7B Instruct ($0.30/1M tokens).

For output processing, Claude Opus 4 ($75.00/1M tokens) is 250.0x more expensive than Qwen2.5 7B Instruct ($0.30/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Claude Opus 4 is more expensive than Qwen2.5 7B Instruct.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers

Thu May 14 2026 • llm-stats.com

Claude Opus 4

Input tokens$15.00

Output tokens$75.00

Best providerAnthropic

Qwen2.5 7B Instruct

Input tokens$0.30

Output tokens$0.30

Best providerTogether

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Claude Opus 4 accepts 200,000 input tokens compared to Qwen2.5 7B Instruct's 131,072 tokens. Claude Opus 4 can generate longer responses up to 32,000 tokens, while Qwen2.5 7B Instruct is limited to 8,192 tokens.

Claude Opus 4

Input200,000 tokens

Output32,000 tokens

Qwen2.5 7B Instruct

Input131,072 tokens

Output8,192 tokens

Thu May 14 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Claude Opus 4 supports multimodal inputs, whereas Qwen2.5 7B Instruct does not.

Claude Opus 4 can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Claude Opus 4

Text

Images

Audio

Video

Qwen2.5 7B Instruct

Text

Images

Audio

Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Claude Opus 4 is licensed under a proprietary license, while Qwen2.5 7B Instruct uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Claude Opus 4

Proprietary

Closed source

Qwen2.5 7B Instruct

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Claude Opus 4 was released on 2025-05-22, while Qwen2.5 7B Instruct was released on 2024-09-19.

Claude Opus 4 is 8 months newer than Qwen2.5 7B Instruct.

Claude Opus 4

May 22, 2025

11 months ago

8mo newer

Qwen2.5 7B Instruct

Sep 19, 2024

1.6 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

Claude Opus 4 is available from Anthropic, Bedrock, Google. Qwen2.5 7B Instruct is available from Together.

Claude Opus 4

Anthropic

Input Price:Input: $15.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $75.00/1M

AWS Bedrock

Input Price:Input: $15.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $75.00/1M

Google

Input Price:Input: $15.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $75.00/1M

Qwen2.5 7B Instruct

Together

Input Price:Input: $0.30/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.30/1M

* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Claude Opus 4

View details

Anthropic

Larger context window (200,000 tokens)

Supports multimodal inputs

Higher GPQA score (79.6% vs 36.4%)

Qwen2.5 7B Instruct

View details

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Less expensive input tokens

Less expensive output tokens

Has open weights

Claude Opus 4

Qwen2.5 7B Instruct

Compare in Playground

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature	Claude Opus 4	Qwen2.5 7B Instruct

FAQ

Common questions about Claude Opus 4 vs Qwen2.5 7B Instruct.

Which is better, Claude Opus 4 or Qwen2.5 7B Instruct?

Claude Opus 4 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Claude Opus 4 is made by Anthropic and Qwen2.5 7B Instruct is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Claude Opus 4 compare to Qwen2.5 7B Instruct in benchmarks?

Claude Opus 4 scores MMMLU: 88.8%, TAU-bench Retail: 81.4%, GPQA: 79.6%, MMMU (validation): 76.5%, AIME 2025: 75.5%. Qwen2.5 7B Instruct scores GSM8k: 91.6%, MT-Bench: 87.5%, HumanEval: 84.8%, MBPP: 79.2%, MATH: 75.5%.

Is Claude Opus 4 cheaper than Qwen2.5 7B Instruct?

Qwen2.5 7B Instruct is 50.0x cheaper for input tokens. Claude Opus 4 costs $15.00/M input and $75.00/M output via anthropic. Qwen2.5 7B Instruct costs $0.30/M input and $0.30/M output via together.

What are the context window sizes for Claude Opus 4 and Qwen2.5 7B Instruct?

Claude Opus 4 supports 200K tokens and Qwen2.5 7B Instruct supports 131K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Claude Opus 4 and Qwen2.5 7B Instruct?

Key differences include context window (200K vs 131K), input pricing ($15.00 vs $0.30/M), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Claude Opus 4 and Qwen2.5 7B Instruct?

Claude Opus 4 is developed by Anthropic and Qwen2.5 7B Instruct is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.