Model Comparison
Claude Opus 4.5 vs DeepSeek-V3Which is better in 2026?
Claude Opus 4.5 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. DeepSeek-V3 is 20.9x cheaper per token.
Verdict: Claude Opus 4.5 vs DeepSeek-V3 — which is better?
Claude Opus 4.5 (by Anthropic) and DeepSeek-V3 (by DeepSeek) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.
Claude Opus 4.5 outperforms in 2 benchmarks (GPQA, SWE-Bench Verified), while DeepSeek-V3 is better at 0 benchmarks. Claude Opus 4.5 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
On price, DeepSeek-V3 is roughly 20.9x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.
Claude Opus 4.5 also accepts a larger context window (200,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.
Choose Claude Opus 4.5 if…
- you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 2 of 2 shared benchmarks
- you process long inputs — it offers a 200,000 token context window
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped Nov 2025
Choose DeepSeek-V3 if…
- cost matters — it's about 20.9x cheaper per token
- you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune
Performance Benchmarks
Comparative analysis across standard metrics
Claude Opus 4.5 outperforms in 2 benchmarks (GPQA, SWE-Bench Verified), while DeepSeek-V3 is better at 0 benchmarks.
Claude Opus 4.5 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
Arena Performance
Human preference votes
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
For input processing, Claude Opus 4.5 ($5.00/1M tokens) is 18.5x more expensive than DeepSeek-V3 ($0.27/1M tokens).
For output processing, Claude Opus 4.5 ($25.00/1M tokens) is 22.7x more expensive than DeepSeek-V3 ($1.10/1M tokens).
In conclusion, Claude Opus 4.5 is more expensive than DeepSeek-V3.*
* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
Claude Opus 4.5 accepts 200,000 input tokens compared to DeepSeek-V3's 131,072 tokens. DeepSeek-V3 can generate longer responses up to 131,072 tokens, while Claude Opus 4.5 is limited to 64,000 tokens.
Input Capabilities
Supported data types and modalities
Claude Opus 4.5 supports multimodal inputs, whereas DeepSeek-V3 does not.
Claude Opus 4.5 can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.
Claude Opus 4.5
DeepSeek-V3
License
Usage and distribution terms
Claude Opus 4.5 is licensed under a proprietary license, while DeepSeek-V3 uses MIT + Model License (Commercial use allowed).
License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.
Proprietary
Closed source
MIT + Model License (Commercial use allowed)
Open weights
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
Claude Opus 4.5 was released on 2025-11-24, while DeepSeek-V3 was released on 2024-12-25.
Claude Opus 4.5 is 11 months newer than DeepSeek-V3.
Nov 24, 2025
6 months ago
11mo newerDec 25, 2024
1.4 years ago
Knowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Claude Opus 4.5 has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2025-03-31, while DeepSeek-V3's cutoff date is not specified.
We can confirm Claude Opus 4.5's training data extends to 2025-03-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without DeepSeek-V3's cutoff date.
Mar 2025
—
Provider Availability
Claude Opus 4.5 is available from Anthropic. DeepSeek-V3 is available from DeepSeek.
Claude Opus 4.5
DeepSeek-V3
Outputs Comparison
Key Takeaways
Claude Opus 4.5
View detailsAnthropic
DeepSeek-V3
View detailsDeepSeek
Detailed Comparison
| Feature |
|---|
FAQ
Common questions about Claude Opus 4.5 vs DeepSeek-V3.