Model Comparison
Claude Opus 4.5 vs Grok-4 Fast Non-ReasoningWhich is better in 2026?
Comparing Claude Opus 4.5 and Grok-4 Fast Non-Reasoning across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.
Verdict: Claude Opus 4.5 vs Grok-4 Fast Non-Reasoning — which is better?
Claude Opus 4.5 (by Anthropic) and Grok-4 Fast Non-Reasoning (by xAI) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.
On price, Grok-4 Fast Non-Reasoning is roughly 36.4x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.
Grok-4 Fast Non-Reasoning also accepts a larger context window (2,000,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.
Choose Claude Opus 4.5 if…
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped Nov 2025
Choose Grok-4 Fast Non-Reasoning if…
- cost matters — it's about 36.4x cheaper per token
- you process long inputs — it offers a 2,000,000 token context window
Performance Benchmarks
Comparative analysis across standard metrics
Claude Opus 4.5 and Grok-4 Fast Non-Reasoningdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.
Arena Performance
Human preference votes
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
For input processing, Claude Opus 4.5 ($5.00/1M tokens) is 25.0x more expensive than Grok-4 Fast Non-Reasoning ($0.20/1M tokens).
For output processing, Claude Opus 4.5 ($25.00/1M tokens) is 50.0x more expensive than Grok-4 Fast Non-Reasoning ($0.50/1M tokens).
In conclusion, Claude Opus 4.5 is more expensive than Grok-4 Fast Non-Reasoning.*
* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
Grok-4 Fast Non-Reasoning accepts 2,000,000 input tokens compared to Claude Opus 4.5's 200,000 tokens. Claude Opus 4.5 can generate longer responses up to 64,000 tokens, while Grok-4 Fast Non-Reasoning is limited to 30,000 tokens.
Input Capabilities
Supported data types and modalities
Both Claude Opus 4.5 and Grok-4 Fast Non-Reasoning support multimodal inputs.
They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.
Claude Opus 4.5
Grok-4 Fast Non-Reasoning
License
Usage and distribution terms
Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.
Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.
Proprietary
Closed source
Proprietary
Closed source
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
Claude Opus 4.5 was released on 2025-11-24, while Grok-4 Fast Non-Reasoning was released on 2025-08-28.
Claude Opus 4.5 is 3 months newer than Grok-4 Fast Non-Reasoning.
Nov 24, 2025
6 months ago
2mo newerAug 28, 2025
9 months ago
Knowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Claude Opus 4.5 has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2025-03-31, while Grok-4 Fast Non-Reasoning's cutoff date is not specified.
We can confirm Claude Opus 4.5's training data extends to 2025-03-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without Grok-4 Fast Non-Reasoning's cutoff date.
Mar 2025
—
Provider Availability
Claude Opus 4.5 is available from Anthropic. Grok-4 Fast Non-Reasoning is available from xAI.
Claude Opus 4.5
Grok-4 Fast Non-Reasoning
Outputs Comparison
Key Takeaways
Claude Opus 4.5
View detailsAnthropic
No standout differentiators in the data we have for this pair.
Detailed Comparison
| Feature |
|---|
FAQ
Common questions about Claude Opus 4.5 vs Grok-4 Fast Non-Reasoning.