Model Comparison

Claude Opus 4.5 vs Grok-4.1Which is better in 2026?

Comparing Claude Opus 4.5 and Grok-4.1 across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

Verdict: Claude Opus 4.5 vs Grok-4.1 — which is better?

Claude Opus 4.5 (by Anthropic) and Grok-4.1 (by xAI) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

On price, Grok-4.1 is roughly 1.7x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Grok-4.1 also accepts a larger context window (256,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Choose Claude Opus 4.5 if…

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Nov 2025

Choose Grok-4.1 if…

  • cost matters — it's about 1.7x cheaper per token
  • you process long inputs — it offers a 256,000 token context window
Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

No common benchmarks found

Claude Opus 4.5 and Grok-4.1 don't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Grok-4.1 costs less

For input processing, Claude Opus 4.5 ($5.00/1M tokens) is 1.7x more expensive than Grok-4.1 ($3.00/1M tokens).

For output processing, Claude Opus 4.5 ($25.00/1M tokens) is 1.7x more expensive than Grok-4.1 ($15.00/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Claude Opus 4.5 is more expensive than Grok-4.1.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Sat Jun 06 2026 • llm-stats.com
Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.5
Input tokens$5.00
Output tokens$25.00
Best providerAnthropic
xAI
Grok-4.1
Input tokens$3.00
Output tokens$15.00
Best providerxAI
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Grok-4.1 accepts 256,000 input tokens compared to Claude Opus 4.5's 200,000 tokens. Claude Opus 4.5 can generate longer responses up to 64,000 tokens, while Grok-4.1 is limited to 8,000 tokens.

Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.5
Input200,000 tokens
Output64,000 tokens
xAI
Grok-4.1
Input256,000 tokens
Output8,000 tokens
Sat Jun 06 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both Claude Opus 4.5 and Grok-4.1 support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Claude Opus 4.5

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Grok-4.1

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Claude Opus 4.5

Proprietary

Closed source

Grok-4.1

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Claude Opus 4.5 was released on 2025-11-24, while Grok-4.1 was released on 2025-11-17.

Claude Opus 4.5 is 0 month newer than Grok-4.1.

Claude Opus 4.5

Nov 24, 2025

6 months ago

1w newer
Grok-4.1

Nov 17, 2025

6 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Claude Opus 4.5 has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2025-03-31, while Grok-4.1's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Claude Opus 4.5's training data extends to 2025-03-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without Grok-4.1's cutoff date.

Claude Opus 4.5

Mar 2025

Grok-4.1

—

Provider Availability

Claude Opus 4.5 is available from Anthropic. Grok-4.1 is available from xAI.

Claude Opus 4.5

anthropic logo
Anthropic
Input Price:Input: $5.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $25.00/1M

Grok-4.1

xai logo
xAI
Input Price:Input: $3.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $15.00/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Anthropic

No standout differentiators in the data we have for this pair.

xAI
Larger context window (256,000 tokens)
Less expensive input tokens
Less expensive output tokens

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.5
xAI
Grok-4.1

FAQ

Common questions about Claude Opus 4.5 vs Grok-4.1.

Which is better, Claude Opus 4.5 or Grok-4.1?

Claude Opus 4.5 (Anthropic) and Grok-4.1 (xAI) each have strengths in different areas. Compare their benchmark scores, pricing, context windows, and capabilities above to determine which fits your needs.

How does Claude Opus 4.5 compare to Grok-4.1 in benchmarks?

Claude Opus 4.5 scores Tau2 Telecom: 98.2%, MMMLU: 90.8%, Tau2 Retail: 88.9%, GPQA: 87.0%, SWE-Bench Verified: 80.9%. Grok-4.1 scores FActScore: 97.0%, Creative Writing v3: 85.4%, EQ-Bench: 79.3%, LMArena Text Leaderboard: 73.3%.

Is Claude Opus 4.5 cheaper than Grok-4.1?

Grok-4.1 is 1.7x cheaper for input tokens. Claude Opus 4.5 costs $5.00/M input and $25.00/M output via anthropic. Grok-4.1 costs $3.00/M input and $15.00/M output via xai.

What are the context window sizes for Claude Opus 4.5 and Grok-4.1?

Claude Opus 4.5 supports 200K tokens and Grok-4.1 supports 256K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Claude Opus 4.5 and Grok-4.1?

Key differences include context window (200K vs 256K), input pricing ($5.00 vs $3.00/M). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Claude Opus 4.5 and Grok-4.1?

Claude Opus 4.5 is developed by Anthropic and Grok-4.1 is developed by xAI.

Related comparisons