Model Comparison
Claude Opus 4.5 vs Qwen3 MaxWhich is better in 2026?
Claude Opus 4.5 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Qwen3 Max is 6.2x cheaper per token.
Verdict: Claude Opus 4.5 vs Qwen3 Max — which is better?
Claude Opus 4.5 (by Anthropic) and Qwen3 Max (by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.
Claude Opus 4.5 outperforms in 2 benchmarks (GPQA, SWE-Bench Verified), while Qwen3 Max is better at 0 benchmarks. Claude Opus 4.5 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
On price, Qwen3 Max is roughly 6.2x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.
Qwen3 Max also accepts a larger context window (256,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.
Choose Claude Opus 4.5 if…
- you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 2 of 2 shared benchmarks
Choose Qwen3 Max if…
- cost matters — it's about 6.2x cheaper per token
- you process long inputs — it offers a 256,000 token context window
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped Dec 2025
Performance Benchmarks
Comparative analysis across standard metrics
Claude Opus 4.5 outperforms in 2 benchmarks (GPQA, SWE-Bench Verified), while Qwen3 Max is better at 0 benchmarks.
Claude Opus 4.5 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
Arena Performance
Human preference votes
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
For input processing, Claude Opus 4.5 ($5.00/1M tokens) is 10.0x more expensive than Qwen3 Max ($0.50/1M tokens).
For output processing, Claude Opus 4.5 ($25.00/1M tokens) is 5.0x more expensive than Qwen3 Max ($5.00/1M tokens).
In conclusion, Claude Opus 4.5 is more expensive than Qwen3 Max.*
* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
Qwen3 Max accepts 256,000 input tokens compared to Claude Opus 4.5's 200,000 tokens. Qwen3 Max can generate longer responses up to 131,072 tokens, while Claude Opus 4.5 is limited to 64,000 tokens.
Input Capabilities
Supported data types and modalities
Claude Opus 4.5 supports multimodal inputs, whereas Qwen3 Max does not.
Claude Opus 4.5 can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.
Claude Opus 4.5
Qwen3 Max
License
Usage and distribution terms
Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.
Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.
Proprietary
Closed source
Proprietary
Closed source
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
Claude Opus 4.5 was released on 2025-11-24, while Qwen3 Max was released on 2025-12-15.
Qwen3 Max is 1 month newer than Claude Opus 4.5.
Nov 24, 2025
6 months ago
Dec 15, 2025
5 months ago
3w newerKnowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Claude Opus 4.5 has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2025-03-31, while Qwen3 Max's cutoff date is not specified.
We can confirm Claude Opus 4.5's training data extends to 2025-03-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without Qwen3 Max's cutoff date.
Mar 2025
—
Provider Availability
Claude Opus 4.5 is available from Anthropic. Qwen3 Max is available from Novita.
Claude Opus 4.5
Qwen3 Max
Outputs Comparison
Key Takeaways
Claude Opus 4.5
View detailsAnthropic
Qwen3 Max
View detailsAlibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Detailed Comparison
| Feature | | |
|---|
FAQ
Common questions about Claude Opus 4.5 vs Qwen3 Max.