Claude Opus 4.5 vs Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct
Claude Opus 4.5 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct is 30.8x cheaper per token.
Anthropic · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026
Which is better?
Claude Opus 4.5 outperforms in 2 benchmarks (GPQA, OSWorld), while Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct is better at 0 benchmarks. Claude Opus 4.5 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
On price, Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct is roughly 30.8x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.
Claude Opus 4.5 also accepts a larger context window (200,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.
Based on current benchmark, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.
Choose Claude Opus 4.5
- you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 2 of 2 shared benchmarks
- you process long inputs — it offers a 200,000 token context window
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped Nov 2025
Choose Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct
- cost matters — it's about 30.8x cheaper per token
- you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune
At a glance
The differences that matter most.
Performance Benchmarks
Comparative analysis across standard metrics
Claude Opus 4.5 outperforms in 2 benchmarks (GPQA, OSWorld), while Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct is better at 0 benchmarks.
Claude Opus 4.5 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
Arena Performance
Playground indexes and blind preference scores
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
For input processing, Claude Opus 4.5 ($5.00/1M tokens) is 25.0x more expensive than Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct ($0.20/1M tokens).
For output processing, Claude Opus 4.5 ($25.00/1M tokens) is 35.7x more expensive than Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct ($0.70/1M tokens).
In conclusion, Claude Opus 4.5 is more expensive than Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct.*
* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
Claude Opus 4.5 accepts 200,000 input tokens compared to Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct's 131,072 tokens. Claude Opus 4.5 can generate longer responses up to 64,000 tokens, while Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct is limited to 32,768 tokens.
Input Capabilities
Supported data types and modalities
Both Claude Opus 4.5 and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct support multimodal inputs.
They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.
Claude Opus 4.5
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct
License
Usage and distribution terms
Claude Opus 4.5 is licensed under a proprietary license, while Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct uses Apache 2.0.
License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.
Proprietary
Closed source
Apache 2.0
Open weights
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
Claude Opus 4.5 was released on 2025-11-24, while Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct was released on 2025-09-22.
Claude Opus 4.5 is 2 months newer than Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct.
Nov 24, 2025
9 months ago
2mo newerSep 22, 2025
11 months ago
Knowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Claude Opus 4.5 has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2025-03-31, while Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct's cutoff date is not specified.
We can confirm Claude Opus 4.5's training data extends to 2025-03-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct's cutoff date.
Mar 2025
—
Provider Availability
Claude Opus 4.5 is available from Anthropic. Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct is available from Novita, DeepInfra.
Claude Opus 4.5
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct
Outputs Comparison
Judge for yourself.
Run your own prompts against Claude Opus 4.5 and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.
FAQ
Common questions about Claude Opus 4.5 vs Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct.