Claude Opus 4.6 vs GLM-5 Comparison

Comparing Claude Opus 4.6 and GLM-5 across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

4 benchmarks

Claude Opus 4.6 outperforms in 3 benchmarks (BrowseComp, SWE-Bench Verified, Terminal-Bench 2.0), while GLM-5 is better at 1 benchmark (MCP Atlas).

Claude Opus 4.6 shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

Sat Mar 14 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

GLM-5 costs less

For input processing, Claude Opus 4.6 ($5.00/1M tokens) is 5.0x more expensive than GLM-5 ($1.00/1M tokens).

For output processing, Claude Opus 4.6 ($25.00/1M tokens) is 7.8x more expensive than GLM-5 ($3.20/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Claude Opus 4.6 is more expensive than GLM-5.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Sat Mar 14 2026 • llm-stats.com
Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.6
Input tokens$5.00
Output tokens$25.00
Best providerAnthropic
Zhipu AI
GLM-5
Input tokens$1.00
Output tokens$3.20
Best providerUnknown Organization
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Both models have the same input context window of 200,000 tokens. Both models can generate responses up to 128,000 tokens.

Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.6
Input200,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Zhipu AI
GLM-5
Input200,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Sat Mar 14 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Claude Opus 4.6 supports multimodal inputs, whereas GLM-5 does not.

Claude Opus 4.6 can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Claude Opus 4.6

Text
Images
Audio
Video

GLM-5

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Claude Opus 4.6 is licensed under a proprietary license, while GLM-5 uses MIT.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Claude Opus 4.6

Proprietary

Closed source

GLM-5

MIT

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Claude Opus 4.6 was released on 2026-02-05, while GLM-5 was released on 2026-02-11.

GLM-5 is 0 month newer than Claude Opus 4.6.

Claude Opus 4.6

Feb 5, 2026

1 months ago

GLM-5

Feb 11, 2026

1 months ago

6d newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

Claude Opus 4.6 is available from Anthropic. GLM-5 is available from ZAI. The availability of providers can affect quality of the model and reliability.

Claude Opus 4.6

anthropic logo
Anthropic
Input Price:Input: $5.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $25.00/1M

GLM-5

z logo
Unknown Organization
Input Price:Input: $1.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $3.20/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Anthropic
Supports multimodal inputs
Higher BrowseComp score (84.0% vs 75.9%)
Higher SWE-Bench Verified score (80.8% vs 77.8%)
Higher Terminal-Bench 2.0 score (65.4% vs 56.2%)
Zhipu AI
Less expensive input tokens
Less expensive output tokens
Has open weights
Higher MCP Atlas score (67.8% vs 59.5%)

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.6
Zhipu AI
GLM-5