Model Comparison

Claude Opus 4.6 vs GPT-4.1 miniWhich is better in 2026?

Claude Opus 4.6 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. GPT-4.1 mini is 14.3x cheaper per token.

Verdict: Claude Opus 4.6 vs GPT-4.1 mini — which is better?

Claude Opus 4.6 (by Anthropic) and GPT-4.1 mini (by OpenAI) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

Claude Opus 4.6 outperforms in 8 benchmarks (AIME 2025, CharXiv-R, GPQA, Graphwalks BFS >128k, Graphwalks parents >128k, Humanity's Last Exam, MMMLU, SWE-Bench Verified), while GPT-4.1 mini is better at 0 benchmarks. Claude Opus 4.6 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

On price, GPT-4.1 mini is roughly 14.3x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

GPT-4.1 mini also accepts a larger context window (1,047,576 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Choose Claude Opus 4.6 if…

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 8 of 8 shared benchmarks
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Feb 2026

Choose GPT-4.1 mini if…

  • cost matters — it's about 14.3x cheaper per token
  • you process long inputs — it offers a 1,047,576 token context window
Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

8 benchmarks

Claude Opus 4.6 outperforms in 8 benchmarks (AIME 2025, CharXiv-R, GPQA, Graphwalks BFS >128k, Graphwalks parents >128k, Humanity's Last Exam, MMMLU, SWE-Bench Verified), while GPT-4.1 mini is better at 0 benchmarks.

Claude Opus 4.6 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Sat Jun 06 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

GPT-4.1 mini costs less

For input processing, Claude Opus 4.6 ($5.00/1M tokens) is 12.5x more expensive than GPT-4.1 mini ($0.40/1M tokens).

For output processing, Claude Opus 4.6 ($25.00/1M tokens) is 15.6x more expensive than GPT-4.1 mini ($1.60/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Claude Opus 4.6 is more expensive than GPT-4.1 mini.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Sat Jun 06 2026 • llm-stats.com
Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.6
Input tokens$5.00
Output tokens$25.00
Best providerAnthropic
OpenAI
GPT-4.1 mini
Input tokens$0.40
Output tokens$1.60
Best providerOpenAI
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

GPT-4.1 mini accepts 1,047,576 input tokens compared to Claude Opus 4.6's 1,000,000 tokens. Claude Opus 4.6 can generate longer responses up to 128,000 tokens, while GPT-4.1 mini is limited to 32,768 tokens.

Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.6
Input1,000,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
OpenAI
GPT-4.1 mini
Input1,047,576 tokens
Output32,768 tokens
Sat Jun 06 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both Claude Opus 4.6 and GPT-4.1 mini support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Claude Opus 4.6

Text
Images
Audio
Video

GPT-4.1 mini

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Claude Opus 4.6

Proprietary

Closed source

GPT-4.1 mini

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Claude Opus 4.6 was released on 2026-02-05, while GPT-4.1 mini was released on 2025-04-14.

Claude Opus 4.6 is 10 months newer than GPT-4.1 mini.

Claude Opus 4.6

Feb 5, 2026

4 months ago

9mo newer
GPT-4.1 mini

Apr 14, 2025

1.1 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

GPT-4.1 mini has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-05-31, while Claude Opus 4.6's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm GPT-4.1 mini's training data extends to 2024-05-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without Claude Opus 4.6's cutoff date.

Claude Opus 4.6

—

GPT-4.1 mini

May 2024

Provider Availability

Claude Opus 4.6 is available from Anthropic. GPT-4.1 mini is available from OpenAI.

Claude Opus 4.6

anthropic logo
Anthropic
Input Price:Input: $5.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $25.00/1M

GPT-4.1 mini

openai logo
OpenAI
Input Price:Input: $0.40/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.60/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Anthropic
Higher AIME 2025 score (99.8% vs 40.2%)
Higher CharXiv-R score (77.4% vs 56.8%)
Higher GPQA score (91.3% vs 65.0%)
Higher Graphwalks BFS >128k score (61.5% vs 15.0%)
Higher Graphwalks parents >128k score (95.4% vs 11.0%)
Higher Humanity's Last Exam score (53.1% vs 3.7%)
Higher MMMLU score (91.1% vs 78.5%)
Higher SWE-Bench Verified score (80.8% vs 23.6%)
OpenAI
Larger context window (1,047,576 tokens)
Less expensive input tokens
Less expensive output tokens
AnthropicClaude Opus 4.6
OpenAIGPT-4.1 mini
Compare in Playground

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.6
OpenAI
GPT-4.1 mini

FAQ

Common questions about Claude Opus 4.6 vs GPT-4.1 mini.

Which is better, Claude Opus 4.6 or GPT-4.1 mini?

Claude Opus 4.6 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Claude Opus 4.6 is made by Anthropic and GPT-4.1 mini is made by OpenAI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Claude Opus 4.6 compare to GPT-4.1 mini in benchmarks?

Claude Opus 4.6 scores Vending-Bench 2: 100.0%, AIME 2025: 99.8%, Tau2 Telecom: 99.3%, Graphwalks parents >128k: 95.4%, MRCR v2 (8-needle): 93.0%. GPT-4.1 mini scores CharXiv-D: 88.4%, MMLU: 87.5%, IFEval: 84.1%, MMMLU: 78.5%, MathVista: 73.1%.

Is Claude Opus 4.6 cheaper than GPT-4.1 mini?

GPT-4.1 mini is 12.5x cheaper for input tokens. Claude Opus 4.6 costs $5.00/M input and $25.00/M output via anthropic. GPT-4.1 mini costs $0.40/M input and $1.60/M output via openai.

What are the context window sizes for Claude Opus 4.6 and GPT-4.1 mini?

Claude Opus 4.6 supports 1.0M tokens and GPT-4.1 mini supports 1.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Claude Opus 4.6 and GPT-4.1 mini?

Key differences include context window (1.0M vs 1.0M), input pricing ($5.00 vs $0.40/M). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Claude Opus 4.6 and GPT-4.1 mini?

Claude Opus 4.6 is developed by Anthropic and GPT-4.1 mini is developed by OpenAI.

Related comparisons