Model Comparison

Claude Opus 4.6 vs LongCat-Flash-Lite

Claude Opus 4.6 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. LongCat-Flash-Lite is 57.1x cheaper per token.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

6 benchmarks

Claude Opus 4.6 outperforms in 6 benchmarks (AIME 2025, GPQA, SWE-bench Multilingual, SWE-Bench Verified, Tau2 Retail, Tau2 Telecom), while LongCat-Flash-Lite is better at 0 benchmarks.

Claude Opus 4.6 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Fri May 22 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

LongCat-Flash-Lite costs less

For input processing, Claude Opus 4.6 ($5.00/1M tokens) is 50.0x more expensive than LongCat-Flash-Lite ($0.10/1M tokens).

For output processing, Claude Opus 4.6 ($25.00/1M tokens) is 62.5x more expensive than LongCat-Flash-Lite ($0.40/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Claude Opus 4.6 is more expensive than LongCat-Flash-Lite.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Fri May 22 2026 • llm-stats.com
Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.6
Input tokens$5.00
Output tokens$25.00
Best providerAnthropic
Meituan
LongCat-Flash-Lite
Input tokens$0.10
Output tokens$0.40
Best providerMeituan
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Claude Opus 4.6 accepts 1,000,000 input tokens compared to LongCat-Flash-Lite's 256,000 tokens. Both models can generate responses up to 128,000 tokens.

Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.6
Input1,000,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Meituan
LongCat-Flash-Lite
Input256,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Fri May 22 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Claude Opus 4.6 supports multimodal inputs, whereas LongCat-Flash-Lite does not.

Claude Opus 4.6 can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Claude Opus 4.6

Text
Images
Audio
Video

LongCat-Flash-Lite

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Claude Opus 4.6 is licensed under a proprietary license, while LongCat-Flash-Lite uses MIT.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Claude Opus 4.6

Proprietary

Closed source

LongCat-Flash-Lite

MIT

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Both models were released on 2026-02-05.

They likely represent similar generations of model development.

Claude Opus 4.6

Feb 5, 2026

3 months ago

LongCat-Flash-Lite

Feb 5, 2026

3 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

Claude Opus 4.6 is available from Anthropic. LongCat-Flash-Lite is available from Meituan.

Claude Opus 4.6

anthropic logo
Anthropic
Input Price:Input: $5.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $25.00/1M

LongCat-Flash-Lite

meituan logo
Meituan
Input Price:Input: $0.10/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.40/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Anthropic
Larger context window (1,000,000 tokens)
Supports multimodal inputs
Higher AIME 2025 score (99.8% vs 63.2%)
Higher GPQA score (91.3% vs 66.8%)
Higher SWE-bench Multilingual score (77.8% vs 38.1%)
Higher SWE-Bench Verified score (80.8% vs 54.4%)
Higher Tau2 Retail score (91.9% vs 73.1%)
Higher Tau2 Telecom score (99.3% vs 72.8%)
Meituan
Less expensive input tokens
Less expensive output tokens
Has open weights

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.6
Meituan
LongCat-Flash-Lite

FAQ

Common questions about Claude Opus 4.6 vs LongCat-Flash-Lite.

Which is better, Claude Opus 4.6 or LongCat-Flash-Lite?

Claude Opus 4.6 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Claude Opus 4.6 is made by Anthropic and LongCat-Flash-Lite is made by Meituan. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Claude Opus 4.6 compare to LongCat-Flash-Lite in benchmarks?

Claude Opus 4.6 scores Vending-Bench 2: 100.0%, AIME 2025: 99.8%, Tau2 Telecom: 99.3%, Graphwalks parents >128k: 95.4%, MRCR v2 (8-needle): 93.0%. LongCat-Flash-Lite scores MATH-500: 96.8%, MMLU: 85.5%, CMMLU: 82.5%, MMLU-Pro: 78.3%, Tau2 Retail: 73.1%.

Is Claude Opus 4.6 cheaper than LongCat-Flash-Lite?

LongCat-Flash-Lite is 50.0x cheaper for input tokens. Claude Opus 4.6 costs $5.00/M input and $25.00/M output via anthropic. LongCat-Flash-Lite costs $0.10/M input and $0.40/M output via meituan.

What are the context window sizes for Claude Opus 4.6 and LongCat-Flash-Lite?

Claude Opus 4.6 supports 1.0M tokens and LongCat-Flash-Lite supports 256K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Claude Opus 4.6 and LongCat-Flash-Lite?

Key differences include context window (1.0M vs 256K), input pricing ($5.00 vs $0.10/M), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Proprietary vs MIT). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Claude Opus 4.6 and LongCat-Flash-Lite?

Claude Opus 4.6 is developed by Anthropic and LongCat-Flash-Lite is developed by Meituan.