Model Comparison

Claude Opus 4.6 vs Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking

Claude Opus 4.6 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking is 15.2x cheaper per token.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

5 benchmarks

Claude Opus 4.6 outperforms in 5 benchmarks (AIME 2025, CharXiv-R, GPQA, MMMU-Pro, OSWorld), while Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking is better at 0 benchmarks.

Claude Opus 4.6 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Thu Jun 04 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking costs less

For input processing, Claude Opus 4.6 ($5.00/1M tokens) is 27.8x more expensive than Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking ($0.18/1M tokens).

For output processing, Claude Opus 4.6 ($25.00/1M tokens) is 12.0x more expensive than Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking ($2.09/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Claude Opus 4.6 is more expensive than Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers

Thu Jun 04 2026 • llm-stats.com

Claude Opus 4.6

Input tokens$5.00

Output tokens$25.00

Best providerAnthropic

Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking

Input tokens$0.18

Output tokens$2.09

Best providerDeepinfra

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Claude Opus 4.6 accepts 1,000,000 input tokens compared to Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking's 262,144 tokens. Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking can generate longer responses up to 262,144 tokens, while Claude Opus 4.6 is limited to 128,000 tokens.

Claude Opus 4.6

Input1,000,000 tokens

Output128,000 tokens

Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking

Input262,144 tokens

Output262,144 tokens

Thu Jun 04 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both Claude Opus 4.6 and Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Claude Opus 4.6

Text

Images

Audio

Video

Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking

Text

Images

Audio

Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Claude Opus 4.6 is licensed under a proprietary license, while Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Claude Opus 4.6

Proprietary

Closed source

Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Claude Opus 4.6 was released on 2026-02-05, while Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking was released on 2025-09-22.

Claude Opus 4.6 is 5 months newer than Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking.

Claude Opus 4.6

Feb 5, 2026

3 months ago

4mo newer

Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking

Sep 22, 2025

8 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

Claude Opus 4.6 is available from Anthropic. Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking is available from DeepInfra.

Claude Opus 4.6

Anthropic

Input Price:Input: $5.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $25.00/1M

Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking

Deepinfra

Input Price:Input: $0.18/1MOutput Price:Output: $2.09/1M

* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Claude Opus 4.6

View details

Anthropic

Larger context window (1,000,000 tokens)

Higher AIME 2025 score (99.8% vs 80.3%)

Higher CharXiv-R score (77.4% vs 53.0%)

Higher GPQA score (91.3% vs 69.9%)

Higher MMMU-Pro score (77.3% vs 60.4%)

Higher OSWorld score (72.7% vs 33.9%)

Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking

View details

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Less expensive input tokens

Less expensive output tokens

Has open weights

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature	Claude Opus 4.6	Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking

FAQ

Common questions about Claude Opus 4.6 vs Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking.

Which is better, Claude Opus 4.6 or Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking?

Claude Opus 4.6 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Claude Opus 4.6 is made by Anthropic and Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Claude Opus 4.6 compare to Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking in benchmarks?

Claude Opus 4.6 scores Vending-Bench 2: 100.0%, AIME 2025: 99.8%, Tau2 Telecom: 99.3%, Graphwalks parents >128k: 95.4%, MRCR v2 (8-needle): 93.0%. Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking scores DocVQAtest: 95.3%, ScreenSpot: 93.6%, MMLU-Redux: 88.8%, MMBench-V1.1: 87.5%, InfoVQAtest: 86.0%.

Is Claude Opus 4.6 cheaper than Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking?

Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking is 27.8x cheaper for input tokens. Claude Opus 4.6 costs $5.00/M input and $25.00/M output via anthropic. Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking costs $0.18/M input and $2.09/M output via deepinfra.

What are the context window sizes for Claude Opus 4.6 and Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking?

Claude Opus 4.6 supports 1.0M tokens and Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking supports 262K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Claude Opus 4.6 and Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking?

Key differences include context window (1.0M vs 262K), input pricing ($5.00 vs $0.18/M), licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Claude Opus 4.6 and Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking?

Claude Opus 4.6 is developed by Anthropic and Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.