Model Comparison

Claude Opus 4.6 vs Qwen3.6 Plus

Claude Opus 4.6 shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

9 benchmarks

Claude Opus 4.6 outperforms in 6 benchmarks (GPQA, Humanity's Last Exam, MMMLU, SWE-bench Multilingual, SWE-Bench Verified, Terminal-Bench 2.0), while Qwen3.6 Plus is better at 3 benchmarks (CharXiv-R, MCP Atlas, MMMU-Pro).

Claude Opus 4.6 shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

Thu Apr 02 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Cost data unavailable.

Lowest available price from all providers
Thu Apr 02 2026 • llm-stats.com
Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.6
Input tokens$5.00
Output tokens$25.00
Best providerAnthropic
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3.6 Plus
Input tokens$0.00
Output tokens$0.00
Best providerUnknown Organization
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Claude Opus 4.6 specifies input context (1,000,000 tokens). Only Claude Opus 4.6 specifies output context (128,000 tokens).

Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.6
Input1,000,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3.6 Plus
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Thu Apr 02 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both Claude Opus 4.6 and Qwen3.6 Plus support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Claude Opus 4.6

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen3.6 Plus

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Claude Opus 4.6

Proprietary

Closed source

Qwen3.6 Plus

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Claude Opus 4.6 was released on 2026-02-05, while Qwen3.6 Plus was released on 2026-03-31.

Qwen3.6 Plus is 2 months newer than Claude Opus 4.6.

Claude Opus 4.6

Feb 5, 2026

1 months ago

Qwen3.6 Plus

Mar 31, 2026

2 days ago

1mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Anthropic
Larger context window (1,000,000 tokens)
Higher GPQA score (91.3% vs 90.4%)
Higher Humanity's Last Exam score (53.1% vs 28.8%)
Higher MMMLU score (91.1% vs 89.5%)
Higher SWE-bench Multilingual score (77.8% vs 73.8%)
Higher SWE-Bench Verified score (80.8% vs 78.8%)
Higher Terminal-Bench 2.0 score (65.4% vs 61.6%)
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Qwen3.6 Plus

View details

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Higher CharXiv-R score (81.5% vs 77.4%)
Higher MCP Atlas score (74.1% vs 59.5%)
Higher MMMU-Pro score (78.8% vs 77.3%)

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.6
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3.6 Plus

FAQ

Common questions about Claude Opus 4.6 vs Qwen3.6 Plus

Claude Opus 4.6 shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks. Claude Opus 4.6 is made by Anthropic and Qwen3.6 Plus is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.
Claude Opus 4.6 scores Vending-Bench 2: 100.0%, AIME 2025: 99.8%, Tau2 Telecom: 99.3%, Graphwalks parents >128k: 95.4%, MRCR v2 (8-needle): 93.0%. Qwen3.6 Plus scores CountBench: 97.6%, V*: 96.9%, HMMT 2025: 96.7%, AIME 2026: 95.3%, HMMT25: 94.6%.
Claude Opus 4.6 supports 1.0M tokens and Qwen3.6 Plus supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.
Claude Opus 4.6 is developed by Anthropic and Qwen3.6 Plus is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.