The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Claude Opus 5 vs Kimi K2.7 Code

Claude Opus 5 leads the LLM Stats Score 55.4 to 39.3. Kimi K2.7 Code is 7.0x cheaper per token.

Anthropic · Moonshot AI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Claude Opus 5 leads the overall LLM Stats Score 55.4 to 39.3, ranking #3 overall.

In the 2 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Claude Opus 5 wins 2; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

On price, Kimi K2.7 Code is roughly 7.0x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Claude Opus 5 also accepts a larger context window (1,000,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Claude Opus 5

  • overall performance matters — it scores 55.4 and ranks #3 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 2 of 2 exact shared results
  • you process long inputs — it offers a 1,000,000 token context window
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Jul 2026

Choose Kimi K2.7 Code

  • cost matters — it's about 7.0x cheaper per token
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Claude Opus 5
Anthropic
Kimi K2.7 Code
Moonshot AI
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
55.4
#3
39.3
#57
Reasoning
54.3
#4
34.5
#82
Coding
42.3
#8
30.3
#48
Agents
39.9
#6
26.3
#44
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
2 of 2
0 of 2
Input price
$5.00 / M
$0.74 / M
Output price
$25.00 / M
$3.50 / M
Context window
1,000,000
262,144

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
Claude Opus 5
Kimi K2.7 Code
Tool use
27.8#20
24.5#35
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

13 reported for Claude Opus 5 · 9 for Kimi K2.7 Code

2 shared

Claude Opus 5 outperforms in 2 benchmarks (DeepSWE 1.1, FrontierCode 1.1), while Kimi K2.7 Code is better at 0 benchmarks.

Claude Opus 5 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Sun Sep 06 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Kimi K2.7 Code costs less

For input processing, Claude Opus 5 ($5.00/1M tokens) is 6.8x more expensive than Kimi K2.7 Code ($0.74/1M tokens).

For output processing, Claude Opus 5 ($25.00/1M tokens) is 7.1x more expensive than Kimi K2.7 Code ($3.50/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Claude Opus 5 is more expensive than Kimi K2.7 Code.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Sun Sep 06 2026 • llm-stats.com
Anthropic
Claude Opus 5
Input tokens$5.00
Output tokens$25.00
Best providerAnthropic
Moonshot AI
Kimi K2.7 Code
Input tokens$0.74
Output tokens$3.50
Best providerDeepinfra
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Claude Opus 5 accepts 1,000,000 input tokens compared to Kimi K2.7 Code's 262,144 tokens. Kimi K2.7 Code can generate longer responses up to 131,072 tokens, while Claude Opus 5 is limited to 128,000 tokens.

Anthropic
Claude Opus 5
Input1,000,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Moonshot AI
Kimi K2.7 Code
Input262,144 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
Sun Sep 06 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both Claude Opus 5 and Kimi K2.7 Code support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Claude Opus 5

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Kimi K2.7 Code

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Claude Opus 5 is licensed under a proprietary license, while Kimi K2.7 Code uses Modified MIT License.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Claude Opus 5

Proprietary

Closed source

Kimi K2.7 Code

Modified MIT License

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Claude Opus 5 was released on 2026-07-24, while Kimi K2.7 Code was released on 2026-06-12.

Claude Opus 5 is 1 month newer than Kimi K2.7 Code.

Claude Opus 5

Jul 24, 2026

1 months ago

1mo newer
Kimi K2.7 Code

Jun 12, 2026

2 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

Claude Opus 5 is available from Anthropic. Kimi K2.7 Code is available from DeepInfra, Fireworks, Moonshot AI, Novita, Together.

Claude Opus 5

anthropic logo
Anthropic
Input Price:Input: $5.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $25.00/1M

Kimi K2.7 Code

deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.74/1MOutput Price:Output: $3.50/1M
fireworks logo
Fireworks
Input Price:Input: $0.95/1MOutput Price:Output: $4.00/1M
moonshot logo
Unknown Organization
Input Price:Input: $0.95/1MOutput Price:Output: $4.00/1M
novita logo
Novita
Input Price:Input: $0.95/1MOutput Price:Output: $4.00/1M
together logo
Together
Input Price:Input: $0.95/1MOutput Price:Output: $4.00/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Claude Opus 5 and Kimi K2.7 Code side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Claude Opus 5
✓ Preferred
Kimi K2.7 Code
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Claude Opus 5 vs Kimi K2.7 Code.

Which is better, Claude Opus 5 or Kimi K2.7 Code?

Claude Opus 5 leads the LLM Stats Score 55.4 to 39.3. Claude Opus 5 is made by Anthropic and Kimi K2.7 Code is made by Moonshot AI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Claude Opus 5 compare to Kimi K2.7 Code in benchmarks?

Claude Opus 5 scores BrowseComp: 90.8%, BioMysteryBench: 90.1%, OSWorld 2.0: 70.6%, DeepSWE 1.1: 68.8%, Humanity's Last Exam: 64.7%. Kimi K2.7 Code scores MCP-Mark: 81.1%, MCP Atlas: 76.0%, LiveBench: 71.9%, Kimi Code Bench v2: 62.0%, Program Bench: 53.6%.

Is Claude Opus 5 cheaper than Kimi K2.7 Code?

Kimi K2.7 Code is 6.8x cheaper for input tokens. Claude Opus 5 costs $5.00/M input and $25.00/M output via anthropic. Kimi K2.7 Code costs $0.74/M input and $3.50/M output via deepinfra.

What are the context window sizes for Claude Opus 5 and Kimi K2.7 Code?

Claude Opus 5 supports 1.0M tokens and Kimi K2.7 Code supports 262K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Claude Opus 5 and Kimi K2.7 Code?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (55.4 vs 39.3), context window (1.0M vs 262K), input pricing ($5.00 vs $0.74/M), licensing (Proprietary vs Modified MIT License). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Claude Opus 5 and Kimi K2.7 Code?

Claude Opus 5 is developed by Anthropic and Kimi K2.7 Code is developed by Moonshot AI.

Related comparisons