Model Comparison

Claude Opus 5 vs Qwen3.7-PlusWhich is better in 2026?

Claude Opus 5 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Qwen3.7-Plus is 17.9x cheaper per token.

Verdict: Claude Opus 5 vs Qwen3.7-Plus — which is better?

Claude Opus 5 (by Anthropic) and Qwen3.7-Plus (by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

Claude Opus 5 outperforms in 3 benchmarks (FrontierCode 1.1, GDPval-AA, Humanity's Last Exam), while Qwen3.7-Plus is better at 0 benchmarks. Claude Opus 5 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

On price, Qwen3.7-Plus is roughly 17.9x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Choose Claude Opus 5 if…

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 3 of 3 shared benchmarks
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Jul 2026

Choose Qwen3.7-Plus if…

  • cost matters — it's about 17.9x cheaper per token

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

3 benchmarks

Claude Opus 5 outperforms in 3 benchmarks (FrontierCode 1.1, GDPval-AA, Humanity's Last Exam), while Qwen3.7-Plus is better at 0 benchmarks.

Claude Opus 5 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Sun Jul 26 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Qwen3.7-Plus costs less

For input processing, Claude Opus 5 ($5.00/1M tokens) is 15.6x more expensive than Qwen3.7-Plus ($0.32/1M tokens).

For output processing, Claude Opus 5 ($25.00/1M tokens) is 19.5x more expensive than Qwen3.7-Plus ($1.28/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Claude Opus 5 is more expensive than Qwen3.7-Plus.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Sun Jul 26 2026 • llm-stats.com
Anthropic
Claude Opus 5
Input tokens$5.00
Output tokens$25.00
Best providerAnthropic
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3.7-Plus
Input tokens$0.32
Output tokens$1.28
Best providerTogether
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Both models have the same input context window of 1,000,000 tokens. Claude Opus 5 can generate longer responses up to 128,000 tokens, while Qwen3.7-Plus is limited to 65,536 tokens.

Anthropic
Claude Opus 5
Input1,000,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3.7-Plus
Input1,000,000 tokens
Output65,536 tokens
Sun Jul 26 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both Claude Opus 5 and Qwen3.7-Plus support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Claude Opus 5

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen3.7-Plus

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Claude Opus 5

Proprietary

Closed source

Qwen3.7-Plus

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Claude Opus 5 was released on 2026-07-24, while Qwen3.7-Plus was released on 2026-05-31.

Claude Opus 5 is 2 months newer than Qwen3.7-Plus.

Claude Opus 5

Jul 24, 2026

1 days ago

1mo newer
Qwen3.7-Plus

May 31, 2026

1 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

Claude Opus 5 is available from Anthropic. Qwen3.7-Plus is available from Together.

Claude Opus 5

anthropic logo
Anthropic
Input Price:Input: $5.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $25.00/1M

Qwen3.7-Plus

together logo
Together
Input Price:Input: $0.32/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.28/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Anthropic
Higher FrontierCode 1.1 score (53.4% vs 10.2%)
Higher GDPval-AA score (62.0% vs 31.5%)
Higher Humanity's Last Exam score (64.7% vs 34.7%)
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Qwen3.7-Plus

View details

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Less expensive input tokens
Less expensive output tokens

Detailed Comparison

Interactive Arena

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Claude Opus 5 and Qwen3.7-Plus side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Claude Opus 5
✓ Preferred
Qwen3.7-Plus
Open in Playground
AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Anthropic
Claude Opus 5
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3.7-Plus

FAQ

Common questions about Claude Opus 5 vs Qwen3.7-Plus.

Which is better, Claude Opus 5 or Qwen3.7-Plus?

Claude Opus 5 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Claude Opus 5 is made by Anthropic and Qwen3.7-Plus is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Claude Opus 5 compare to Qwen3.7-Plus in benchmarks?

Claude Opus 5 scores BrowseComp: 90.8%, BioMysteryBench: 90.1%, OSWorld 2.0: 70.6%, DeepSWE 1.1: 68.8%, Humanity's Last Exam: 64.7%. Qwen3.7-Plus scores IFEval: 94.6%, MMLU-Redux: 94.5%, HMMT Feb 26: 92.9%, MRCR v2: 91.7%, OmniDocBench 1.5: 91.4%.

Is Claude Opus 5 cheaper than Qwen3.7-Plus?

Qwen3.7-Plus is 15.6x cheaper for input tokens. Claude Opus 5 costs $5.00/M input and $25.00/M output via anthropic. Qwen3.7-Plus costs $0.32/M input and $1.28/M output via together.

What are the context window sizes for Claude Opus 5 and Qwen3.7-Plus?

Claude Opus 5 supports 1.0M tokens and Qwen3.7-Plus supports 1.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Claude Opus 5 and Qwen3.7-Plus?

Key differences include input pricing ($5.00 vs $0.32/M). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Claude Opus 5 and Qwen3.7-Plus?

Claude Opus 5 is developed by Anthropic and Qwen3.7-Plus is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.

Related comparisons