Model Comparison

Claude Sonnet 4 vs DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B

Claude Sonnet 4 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B is 34.3x cheaper per token.

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

1 benchmarks

Claude Sonnet 4 outperforms in 1 benchmarks (GPQA), while DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B is better at 0 benchmarks.

Claude Sonnet 4 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Fri Apr 10 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B costs less

For input processing, Claude Sonnet 4 ($3.00/1M tokens) is 30.0x more expensive than DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B ($0.10/1M tokens).

For output processing, Claude Sonnet 4 ($15.00/1M tokens) is 37.5x more expensive than DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B ($0.40/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Claude Sonnet 4 is more expensive than DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Fri Apr 10 2026 • llm-stats.com
Anthropic
Claude Sonnet 4
Input tokens$3.00
Output tokens$15.00
Best providerAnthropic
DeepSeek
DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B
Input tokens$0.10
Output tokens$0.40
Best providerDeepinfra
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Claude Sonnet 4 accepts 200,000 input tokens compared to DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B's 128,000 tokens. DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B can generate longer responses up to 128,000 tokens, while Claude Sonnet 4 is limited to 64,000 tokens.

Anthropic
Claude Sonnet 4
Input200,000 tokens
Output64,000 tokens
DeepSeek
DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B
Input128,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Fri Apr 10 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Claude Sonnet 4 supports multimodal inputs, whereas DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B does not.

Claude Sonnet 4 can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Claude Sonnet 4

Text
Images
Audio
Video

DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Claude Sonnet 4 is licensed under a proprietary license, while DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B uses MIT.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Claude Sonnet 4

Proprietary

Closed source

DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B

MIT

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Claude Sonnet 4 was released on 2025-05-22, while DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B was released on 2025-01-20.

Claude Sonnet 4 is 4 months newer than DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B.

Claude Sonnet 4

May 22, 2025

10 months ago

4mo newer
DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B

Jan 20, 2025

1.2 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

Claude Sonnet 4 is available from Anthropic, Bedrock, Google. DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B is available from DeepInfra.

Claude Sonnet 4

anthropic logo
Anthropic
Input Price:Input: $3.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $15.00/1M
bedrock logo
AWS Bedrock
Input Price:Input: $3.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $15.00/1M
google logo
Google
Input Price:Input: $3.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $15.00/1M

DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B

deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.10/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.40/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Key Takeaways

Larger context window (200,000 tokens)
Supports multimodal inputs
Higher GPQA score (75.4% vs 65.2%)
Less expensive input tokens
Less expensive output tokens
Has open weights
AnthropicClaude Sonnet 4
DeepSeekDeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Anthropic
Claude Sonnet 4
DeepSeek
DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B

FAQ

Common questions about Claude Sonnet 4 vs DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B

Claude Sonnet 4 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Claude Sonnet 4 is made by Anthropic and DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B is made by DeepSeek. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.
Claude Sonnet 4 scores MMMLU: 86.5%, TAU-bench Retail: 80.5%, GPQA: 75.4%, MMMU: 74.4%, SWE-Bench Verified: 72.7%. DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B scores MATH-500: 94.5%, AIME 2024: 86.7%, GPQA: 65.2%, LiveCodeBench: 57.5%.
DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B is 30.0x cheaper for input tokens. Claude Sonnet 4 costs $3.00/M input and $15.00/M output via anthropic. DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B costs $0.10/M input and $0.40/M output via deepinfra.
Claude Sonnet 4 supports 200K tokens and DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B supports 128K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.
Key differences include context window (200K vs 128K), input pricing ($3.00 vs $0.10/M), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Proprietary vs MIT). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.
Claude Sonnet 4 is developed by Anthropic and DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B is developed by DeepSeek.