Model Comparison

Claude Sonnet 4 vs IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview

Comparing Claude Sonnet 4 and IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

No common benchmarks found

Claude Sonnet 4 and IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview don't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Claude Sonnet 4 specifies input context (200,000 tokens). Only Claude Sonnet 4 specifies output context (64,000 tokens).

Anthropic
Claude Sonnet 4
Input200,000 tokens
Output64,000 tokens
IBM
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Fri May 08 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Claude Sonnet 4 supports multimodal inputs, whereas IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview does not.

Claude Sonnet 4 can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Claude Sonnet 4

Text
Images
Audio
Video

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Claude Sonnet 4 is licensed under a proprietary license, while IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Claude Sonnet 4

Proprietary

Closed source

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Claude Sonnet 4 was released on 2025-05-22, while IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview was released on 2025-05-02.

Claude Sonnet 4 is 1 month newer than IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview.

Claude Sonnet 4

May 22, 2025

11 months ago

2w newer
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview

May 2, 2025

1.0 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Anthropic
Larger context window (200,000 tokens)
Supports multimodal inputs
IBM
Has open weights
AnthropicClaude Sonnet 4
IBMIBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
Compare in Playground

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Anthropic
Claude Sonnet 4
IBM
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview

FAQ

Common questions about Claude Sonnet 4 vs IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview.

Which is better, Claude Sonnet 4 or IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview?

Claude Sonnet 4 (Anthropic) and IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview (IBM) each have strengths in different areas. Compare their benchmark scores, pricing, context windows, and capabilities above to determine which fits your needs.

How does Claude Sonnet 4 compare to IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview in benchmarks?

Claude Sonnet 4 scores MMMLU: 86.5%, TAU-bench Retail: 80.5%, GPQA: 75.4%, MMMU: 74.4%, SWE-Bench Verified: 72.7%. IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview scores AttaQ: 86.1%, HumanEval: 82.4%, HumanEval+: 78.3%, GSM8k: 70.1%, IFEval: 63.0%.

What are the context window sizes for Claude Sonnet 4 and IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview?

Claude Sonnet 4 supports 200K tokens and IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Claude Sonnet 4 and IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview?

Key differences include multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Claude Sonnet 4 and IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview?

Claude Sonnet 4 is developed by Anthropic and IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview is developed by IBM.