Model Comparison

Claude Sonnet 4 vs Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct

Claude Sonnet 4 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

2 benchmarks

Claude Sonnet 4 outperforms in 2 benchmarks (AIME 2025, GPQA), while Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct is better at 0 benchmarks.

Claude Sonnet 4 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Sun May 31 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Claude Sonnet 4 specifies input context (200,000 tokens). Only Claude Sonnet 4 specifies output context (64,000 tokens).

Claude Sonnet 4

Input200,000 tokens

Output64,000 tokens

Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct

Input- tokens

Output- tokens

Sun May 31 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both Claude Sonnet 4 and Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Claude Sonnet 4

Text

Images

Audio

Video

Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct

Text

Images

Audio

Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Claude Sonnet 4 is licensed under a proprietary license, while Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Claude Sonnet 4

Proprietary

Closed source

Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Claude Sonnet 4 was released on 2025-05-22, while Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct was released on 2025-09-22.

Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct is 4 months newer than Claude Sonnet 4.

Claude Sonnet 4

May 22, 2025

1.0 years ago

Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct

Sep 22, 2025

8 months ago

4mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Claude Sonnet 4

View details

Anthropic

Larger context window (200,000 tokens)

Higher AIME 2025 score (70.5% vs 66.2%)

Higher GPQA score (75.4% vs 68.9%)

Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct

View details

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Has open weights

Claude Sonnet 4

Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct

Compare in Playground

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature	Claude Sonnet 4	Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct

FAQ

Common questions about Claude Sonnet 4 vs Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct.

Which is better, Claude Sonnet 4 or Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct?

Claude Sonnet 4 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Claude Sonnet 4 is made by Anthropic and Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Claude Sonnet 4 compare to Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct in benchmarks?

Claude Sonnet 4 scores MMMLU: 86.5%, TAU-bench Retail: 80.5%, GPQA: 75.4%, MMMU: 74.4%, SWE-Bench Verified: 72.7%. Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct scores DocVQAtest: 96.9%, ScreenSpot: 95.8%, CharXiv-D: 90.5%, MMLU-Redux: 89.8%, AI2D: 89.5%.

What are the context window sizes for Claude Sonnet 4 and Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct?

Claude Sonnet 4 supports 200K tokens and Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Claude Sonnet 4 and Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct?

Key differences include licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Claude Sonnet 4 and Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct?

Claude Sonnet 4 is developed by Anthropic and Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.