Model Comparison
Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs MiMo-V2-FlashWhich is better in 2026?
MiMo-V2-Flash shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks. MiMo-V2-Flash is 40.0x cheaper per token.
Verdict: Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs MiMo-V2-Flash — which is better?
Claude Sonnet 4.5 (by Anthropic) and MiMo-V2-Flash (by Xiaomi) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.
Claude Sonnet 4.5 outperforms in 1 benchmarks (Terminal-Bench), while MiMo-V2-Flash is better at 2 benchmarks (AIME 2025, GPQA). MiMo-V2-Flash shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.
On price, MiMo-V2-Flash is roughly 40.0x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.
MiMo-V2-Flash also accepts a larger context window (256,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.
Choose Claude Sonnet 4.5 if…
- you want predictable pricing at $3.00/M input and $15.00/M output
Choose MiMo-V2-Flash if…
- you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 2 of 3 shared benchmarks
- cost matters — it's about 40.0x cheaper per token
- you process long inputs — it offers a 256,000 token context window
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped Dec 2025
- you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune
Performance Benchmarks
Comparative analysis across standard metrics
Claude Sonnet 4.5 outperforms in 1 benchmarks (Terminal-Bench), while MiMo-V2-Flash is better at 2 benchmarks (AIME 2025, GPQA).
MiMo-V2-Flash shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.
Arena Performance
Human preference votes
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
For input processing, Claude Sonnet 4.5 ($3.00/1M tokens) is 30.0x more expensive than MiMo-V2-Flash ($0.10/1M tokens).
For output processing, Claude Sonnet 4.5 ($15.00/1M tokens) is 50.0x more expensive than MiMo-V2-Flash ($0.30/1M tokens).
In conclusion, Claude Sonnet 4.5 is more expensive than MiMo-V2-Flash.*
* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
MiMo-V2-Flash accepts 256,000 input tokens compared to Claude Sonnet 4.5's 200,000 tokens. Claude Sonnet 4.5 can generate longer responses up to 64,000 tokens, while MiMo-V2-Flash is limited to 16,384 tokens.
Input Capabilities
Supported data types and modalities
Claude Sonnet 4.5 supports multimodal inputs, whereas MiMo-V2-Flash does not.
Claude Sonnet 4.5 can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.
Claude Sonnet 4.5
MiMo-V2-Flash
License
Usage and distribution terms
Claude Sonnet 4.5 is licensed under a proprietary license, while MiMo-V2-Flash uses MIT.
License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.
Proprietary
Closed source
MIT
Open weights
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
Claude Sonnet 4.5 was released on 2025-09-29, while MiMo-V2-Flash was released on 2025-12-16.
MiMo-V2-Flash is 3 months newer than Claude Sonnet 4.5.
Sep 29, 2025
8 months ago
Dec 16, 2025
5 months ago
2mo newerKnowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Claude Sonnet 4.5 has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2025-01-31, while MiMo-V2-Flash's cutoff date is not specified.
We can confirm Claude Sonnet 4.5's training data extends to 2025-01-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without MiMo-V2-Flash's cutoff date.
Jan 2025
—
Provider Availability
Claude Sonnet 4.5 is available from Anthropic. MiMo-V2-Flash is available from Xiaomi.
Claude Sonnet 4.5
MiMo-V2-Flash
Outputs Comparison
Key Takeaways
Claude Sonnet 4.5
View detailsAnthropic
Detailed Comparison
| Feature |
|---|
FAQ
Common questions about Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs MiMo-V2-Flash.