The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs o1

Claude Sonnet 4.5 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Claude Sonnet 4.5 is 4.4x cheaper per token.

Anthropic · OpenAI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Claude Sonnet 4.5 outperforms in 4 benchmarks (GPQA, MMMLU, TAU-bench Airline, TAU-bench Retail), while o1 is better at 0 benchmarks. Claude Sonnet 4.5 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

On price, Claude Sonnet 4.5 is roughly 4.4x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Based on current benchmark, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Claude Sonnet 4.5

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 4 of 4 shared benchmarks
  • cost matters — it's about 4.4x cheaper per token
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2025

Choose o1

  • you want predictable pricing at $15.00/M input and $60.00/M output

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Benchmark wins
4 of 4
0 of 4
Input price
$3.00 / M
$15.00 / M
Output price
$15.00 / M
$60.00 / M
Context window
200,000
200,000
Released
Sep 2025
Dec 2024
License
Proprietary
Proprietary

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

4 benchmarks

Claude Sonnet 4.5 outperforms in 4 benchmarks (GPQA, MMMLU, TAU-bench Airline, TAU-bench Retail), while o1 is better at 0 benchmarks.

Claude Sonnet 4.5 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Wed Aug 26 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Playground indexes and blind preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Claude Sonnet 4.5 costs less

For input processing, Claude Sonnet 4.5 ($3.00/1M tokens) is 5.0x cheaper than o1 ($15.00/1M tokens).

For output processing, Claude Sonnet 4.5 ($15.00/1M tokens) is 4.0x cheaper than o1 ($60.00/1M tokens).

In conclusion, o1 is more expensive than Claude Sonnet 4.5.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Wed Aug 26 2026 • llm-stats.com
Anthropic
Claude Sonnet 4.5
Input tokens$3.00
Output tokens$15.00
Best providerAnthropic
OpenAI
o1
Input tokens$15.00
Output tokens$60.00
Best providerAzure
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Both models have the same input context window of 200,000 tokens. o1 can generate longer responses up to 100,000 tokens, while Claude Sonnet 4.5 is limited to 64,000 tokens.

Anthropic
Claude Sonnet 4.5
Input200,000 tokens
Output64,000 tokens
OpenAI
o1
Input200,000 tokens
Output100,000 tokens
Wed Aug 26 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Claude Sonnet 4.5 supports multimodal inputs, whereas o1 does not.

Claude Sonnet 4.5 can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Claude Sonnet 4.5

Text
Images
Audio
Video

o1

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Claude Sonnet 4.5

Proprietary

Closed source

o1

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Claude Sonnet 4.5 was released on 2025-09-29, while o1 was released on 2024-12-17.

Claude Sonnet 4.5 is 10 months newer than o1.

Claude Sonnet 4.5

Sep 29, 2025

11 months ago

9mo newer
o1

Dec 17, 2024

1.7 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Claude Sonnet 4.5 has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2025-01-31, while o1's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Claude Sonnet 4.5's training data extends to 2025-01-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without o1's cutoff date.

Claude Sonnet 4.5

Jan 2025

o1

Provider Availability

Claude Sonnet 4.5 is available from Anthropic. o1 is available from Azure, OpenAI.

Claude Sonnet 4.5

anthropic logo
Anthropic
Input Price:Input: $3.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $15.00/1M

o1

azure logo
Azure
Input Price:Input: $15.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $60.00/1M
openai logo
OpenAI
Input Price:Input: $15.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $60.00/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Claude Sonnet 4.5 and o1 side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Claude Sonnet 4.5
✓ Preferred
o1
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs o1.

Which is better, Claude Sonnet 4.5 or o1?

Claude Sonnet 4.5 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Claude Sonnet 4.5 is made by Anthropic and o1 is made by OpenAI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Claude Sonnet 4.5 compare to o1 in benchmarks?

Claude Sonnet 4.5 scores MMMLU: 89.1%, AIME 2025: 87.0%, TAU-bench Retail: 86.2%, GPQA: 83.4%, MMMUval: 77.8%. o1 scores GSM8k: 97.1%, MATH: 96.4%, GPQA Physics: 92.8%, MMLU: 91.8%, MGSM: 89.3%.

Is Claude Sonnet 4.5 cheaper than o1?

Claude Sonnet 4.5 is 5.0x cheaper for input tokens. Claude Sonnet 4.5 costs $3.00/M input and $15.00/M output via anthropic. o1 costs $15.00/M input and $60.00/M output via azure.

What are the context window sizes for Claude Sonnet 4.5 and o1?

Claude Sonnet 4.5 supports 200K tokens and o1 supports 200K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Claude Sonnet 4.5 and o1?

Key differences include input pricing ($3.00 vs $15.00/M), multimodal support (yes vs no). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Claude Sonnet 4.5 and o1?

Claude Sonnet 4.5 is developed by Anthropic and o1 is developed by OpenAI.