Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs GLM-4.5 Comparison

Comparing Claude Sonnet 4.6 and GLM-4.5 across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

4 benchmarks

Claude Sonnet 4.6 outperforms in 4 benchmarks (BrowseComp, GPQA, Humanity's Last Exam, SWE-Bench Verified), while GLM-4.5 is better at 0 benchmarks.

Claude Sonnet 4.6 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Mon Mar 16 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

GLM-4.5 costs less

For input processing, Claude Sonnet 4.6 ($3.00/1M tokens) is 7.5x more expensive than GLM-4.5 ($0.40/1M tokens).

For output processing, Claude Sonnet 4.6 ($15.00/1M tokens) is 9.4x more expensive than GLM-4.5 ($1.60/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Claude Sonnet 4.6 is more expensive than GLM-4.5.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Mon Mar 16 2026 • llm-stats.com
Anthropic
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Input tokens$3.00
Output tokens$15.00
Best providerAnthropic
Zhipu AI
GLM-4.5
Input tokens$0.40
Output tokens$1.60
Best providerDeepinfra
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Claude Sonnet 4.6 accepts 200,000 input tokens compared to GLM-4.5's 131,072 tokens. GLM-4.5 can generate longer responses up to 131,072 tokens, while Claude Sonnet 4.6 is limited to 64,000 tokens.

Anthropic
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Input200,000 tokens
Output64,000 tokens
Zhipu AI
GLM-4.5
Input131,072 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
Mon Mar 16 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Claude Sonnet 4.6 supports multimodal inputs, whereas GLM-4.5 does not.

Claude Sonnet 4.6 can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Claude Sonnet 4.6

Text
Images
Audio
Video

GLM-4.5

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Claude Sonnet 4.6 is licensed under a proprietary license, while GLM-4.5 uses MIT.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Claude Sonnet 4.6

Proprietary

Closed source

GLM-4.5

MIT

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Claude Sonnet 4.6 was released on 2026-02-17, while GLM-4.5 was released on 2025-07-28.

Claude Sonnet 4.6 is 7 months newer than GLM-4.5.

Claude Sonnet 4.6

Feb 17, 2026

3 weeks ago

6mo newer
GLM-4.5

Jul 28, 2025

7 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

Claude Sonnet 4.6 is available from Anthropic. GLM-4.5 is available from DeepInfra, Fireworks, Novita. The availability of providers can affect quality of the model and reliability.

Claude Sonnet 4.6

anthropic logo
Anthropic
Input Price:Input: $3.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $15.00/1M

GLM-4.5

deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.40/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.60/1M
fireworks logo
Fireworks
Input Price:Input: $0.55/1MOutput Price:Output: $2.19/1M
novita logo
Novita
Input Price:Input: $0.60/1MOutput Price:Output: $2.20/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Key Takeaways

Larger context window (200,000 tokens)
Supports multimodal inputs
Higher BrowseComp score (74.7% vs 26.4%)
Higher GPQA score (89.9% vs 79.1%)
Higher Humanity's Last Exam score (49.0% vs 14.4%)
Higher SWE-Bench Verified score (79.6% vs 64.2%)
Less expensive input tokens
Less expensive output tokens
Has open weights

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Anthropic
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Zhipu AI
GLM-4.5