Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs GLM-4.5-Air Comparison
Comparing Claude Sonnet 4.6 and GLM-4.5-Air across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.
Performance Benchmarks
Comparative analysis across standard metrics
Claude Sonnet 4.6 outperforms in 4 benchmarks (BrowseComp, GPQA, Humanity's Last Exam, SWE-Bench Verified), while GLM-4.5-Air is better at 0 benchmarks.
Claude Sonnet 4.6 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
Arena Performance
Human preference votes
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
Cost data unavailable.
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
Only Claude Sonnet 4.6 specifies input context (200,000 tokens). Only Claude Sonnet 4.6 specifies output context (64,000 tokens).
Input Capabilities
Supported data types and modalities
Claude Sonnet 4.6 supports multimodal inputs, whereas GLM-4.5-Air does not.
Claude Sonnet 4.6 can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.
Claude Sonnet 4.6
GLM-4.5-Air
License
Usage and distribution terms
Claude Sonnet 4.6 is licensed under a proprietary license, while GLM-4.5-Air uses MIT.
License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.
Proprietary
Closed source
MIT
Open weights
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
Claude Sonnet 4.6 was released on 2026-02-17, while GLM-4.5-Air was released on 2025-07-28.
Claude Sonnet 4.6 is 7 months newer than GLM-4.5-Air.
Feb 17, 2026
3 weeks ago
6mo newerJul 28, 2025
7 months ago
Knowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.
Unable to compare the recency of their training data.
Outputs Comparison
Key Takeaways
Claude Sonnet 4.6
View detailsAnthropic
GLM-4.5-Air
View detailsZhipu AI
Detailed Comparison
| Feature | | |
|---|