Model Comparison

Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs GPT-5.1 High

Claude Sonnet 4.6 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. GPT-5.1 High is 1.7x cheaper per token.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

1 benchmarks

Claude Sonnet 4.6 outperforms in 1 benchmarks (GPQA), while GPT-5.1 High is better at 0 benchmarks.

Claude Sonnet 4.6 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Thu Apr 16 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

GPT-5.1 High costs less

For input processing, Claude Sonnet 4.6 ($3.00/1M tokens) is 2.4x more expensive than GPT-5.1 High ($1.25/1M tokens).

For output processing, Claude Sonnet 4.6 ($15.00/1M tokens) is 1.5x more expensive than GPT-5.1 High ($10.00/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Claude Sonnet 4.6 is more expensive than GPT-5.1 High.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Thu Apr 16 2026 • llm-stats.com
Anthropic
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Input tokens$3.00
Output tokens$15.00
Best providerAnthropic
OpenAI
GPT-5.1 High
Input tokens$1.25
Output tokens$10.00
Best providerOpenAI
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

GPT-5.1 High accepts 400,000 input tokens compared to Claude Sonnet 4.6's 200,000 tokens. GPT-5.1 High can generate longer responses up to 128,000 tokens, while Claude Sonnet 4.6 is limited to 64,000 tokens.

Anthropic
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Input200,000 tokens
Output64,000 tokens
OpenAI
GPT-5.1 High
Input400,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Thu Apr 16 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both Claude Sonnet 4.6 and GPT-5.1 High support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Claude Sonnet 4.6

Text
Images
Audio
Video

GPT-5.1 High

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Claude Sonnet 4.6

Proprietary

Closed source

GPT-5.1 High

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Claude Sonnet 4.6 was released on 2026-02-17, while GPT-5.1 High was released on 2025-11-12.

Claude Sonnet 4.6 is 3 months newer than GPT-5.1 High.

Claude Sonnet 4.6

Feb 17, 2026

1 months ago

3mo newer
GPT-5.1 High

Nov 12, 2025

5 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

Claude Sonnet 4.6 is available from Anthropic. GPT-5.1 High is available from OpenAI.

Claude Sonnet 4.6

anthropic logo
Anthropic
Input Price:Input: $3.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $15.00/1M

GPT-5.1 High

openai logo
OpenAI
Input Price:Input: $1.25/1MOutput Price:Output: $10.00/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Anthropic
Higher GPQA score (89.9% vs 88.1%)
OpenAI
Larger context window (400,000 tokens)
Less expensive input tokens
Less expensive output tokens

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Anthropic
Claude Sonnet 4.6
OpenAI
GPT-5.1 High

FAQ

Common questions about Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs GPT-5.1 High

Claude Sonnet 4.6 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Claude Sonnet 4.6 is made by Anthropic and GPT-5.1 High is made by OpenAI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.
Claude Sonnet 4.6 scores Tau2 Telecom: 97.9%, Tau2 Retail: 91.7%, GPQA: 89.9%, MMMLU: 89.3%, SWE-Bench Verified: 79.6%. GPT-5.1 High scores AIME 2025: 99.6%, GPQA: 88.1%.
GPT-5.1 High is 2.4x cheaper for input tokens. Claude Sonnet 4.6 costs $3.00/M input and $15.00/M output via anthropic. GPT-5.1 High costs $1.25/M input and $10.00/M output via openai.
Claude Sonnet 4.6 supports 200K tokens and GPT-5.1 High supports 400K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.
Key differences include context window (200K vs 400K), input pricing ($3.00 vs $1.25/M). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.
Claude Sonnet 4.6 is developed by Anthropic and GPT-5.1 High is developed by OpenAI.