Model Comparison

Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs MiMo-V2-Omni

Claude Sonnet 4.6 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. MiMo-V2-Omni is 7.5x cheaper per token.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

2 benchmarks

Claude Sonnet 4.6 outperforms in 2 benchmarks (GDPval-AA, SWE-Bench Verified), while MiMo-V2-Omni is better at 0 benchmarks.

Claude Sonnet 4.6 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Fri Apr 03 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

MiMo-V2-Omni costs less

For input processing, Claude Sonnet 4.6 ($3.00/1M tokens) is 7.5x more expensive than MiMo-V2-Omni ($0.40/1M tokens).

For output processing, Claude Sonnet 4.6 ($15.00/1M tokens) is 7.5x more expensive than MiMo-V2-Omni ($2.00/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Claude Sonnet 4.6 is more expensive than MiMo-V2-Omni.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Fri Apr 03 2026 • llm-stats.com
Anthropic
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Input tokens$3.00
Output tokens$15.00
Best providerAnthropic
Xiaomi
MiMo-V2-Omni
Input tokens$0.40
Output tokens$2.00
Best providerXiaomi
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

MiMo-V2-Omni accepts 262,000 input tokens compared to Claude Sonnet 4.6's 200,000 tokens. Claude Sonnet 4.6 can generate longer responses up to 64,000 tokens, while MiMo-V2-Omni is limited to 16,384 tokens.

Anthropic
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Input200,000 tokens
Output64,000 tokens
Xiaomi
MiMo-V2-Omni
Input262,000 tokens
Output16,384 tokens
Fri Apr 03 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both Claude Sonnet 4.6 and MiMo-V2-Omni support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Claude Sonnet 4.6

Text
Images
Audio
Video

MiMo-V2-Omni

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Claude Sonnet 4.6

Proprietary

Closed source

MiMo-V2-Omni

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Claude Sonnet 4.6 was released on 2026-02-17, while MiMo-V2-Omni was released on 2026-03-18.

MiMo-V2-Omni is 1 month newer than Claude Sonnet 4.6.

Claude Sonnet 4.6

Feb 17, 2026

1 months ago

MiMo-V2-Omni

Mar 18, 2026

2 weeks ago

4w newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

Claude Sonnet 4.6 is available from Anthropic. MiMo-V2-Omni is available from Xiaomi.

Claude Sonnet 4.6

anthropic logo
Anthropic
Input Price:Input: $3.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $15.00/1M

MiMo-V2-Omni

xiaomi logo
Xiaomi
Input Price:Input: $0.40/1MOutput Price:Output: $2.00/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Anthropic
Higher GDPval-AA score (54.4% vs 47.0%)
Higher SWE-Bench Verified score (79.6% vs 74.8%)
Xiaomi
Larger context window (262,000 tokens)
Less expensive input tokens
Less expensive output tokens

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Anthropic
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Xiaomi
MiMo-V2-Omni

FAQ

Common questions about Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs MiMo-V2-Omni

Claude Sonnet 4.6 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Claude Sonnet 4.6 is made by Anthropic and MiMo-V2-Omni is made by Xiaomi. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.
Claude Sonnet 4.6 scores Tau2 Telecom: 97.9%, Tau2 Retail: 91.7%, GPQA: 89.9%, MMMLU: 89.3%, SWE-Bench Verified: 79.6%. MiMo-V2-Omni scores PinchBench: 81.2%, SWE-Bench Verified: 74.8%, Claw-Eval: 54.8%, MM-BrowserComp: 52.0%, OmniGAIA: 49.8%.
MiMo-V2-Omni is 7.5x cheaper for input tokens. Claude Sonnet 4.6 costs $3.00/M input and $15.00/M output via anthropic. MiMo-V2-Omni costs $0.40/M input and $2.00/M output via xiaomi.
Claude Sonnet 4.6 supports 200K tokens and MiMo-V2-Omni supports 262K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.
Key differences include context window (200K vs 262K), input pricing ($3.00 vs $0.40/M). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.
Claude Sonnet 4.6 is developed by Anthropic and MiMo-V2-Omni is developed by Xiaomi.