Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs Qwen3.5-27B Comparison

Comparing Claude Sonnet 4.6 and Qwen3.5-27B across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

7 benchmarks

Claude Sonnet 4.6 outperforms in 7 benchmarks (BrowseComp, GPQA, Humanity's Last Exam, MMMLU, MMMU-Pro, SWE-Bench Verified, Terminal-Bench 2.0), while Qwen3.5-27B is better at 0 benchmarks.

Claude Sonnet 4.6 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Tue Mar 17 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Cost data unavailable.

Lowest available price from all providers
Tue Mar 17 2026 • llm-stats.com
Anthropic
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Input tokens$0.00
Output tokens$0.00
Best providerUnknown Organization
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3.5-27B
Input tokens$0.00
Output tokens$0.00
Best providerUnknown Organization
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both Claude Sonnet 4.6 and Qwen3.5-27B support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Claude Sonnet 4.6

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen3.5-27B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Claude Sonnet 4.6 is licensed under a proprietary license, while Qwen3.5-27B uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Claude Sonnet 4.6

Proprietary

Closed source

Qwen3.5-27B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Claude Sonnet 4.6 was released on 2026-02-17, while Qwen3.5-27B was released on 2026-02-24.

Qwen3.5-27B is 0 month newer than Claude Sonnet 4.6.

Claude Sonnet 4.6

Feb 17, 2026

4 weeks ago

Qwen3.5-27B

Feb 24, 2026

3 weeks ago

1w newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Key Takeaways

Higher BrowseComp score (74.7% vs 61.0%)
Higher GPQA score (89.9% vs 85.5%)
Higher Humanity's Last Exam score (49.0% vs 48.5%)
Higher MMMLU score (89.3% vs 85.9%)
Higher MMMU-Pro score (75.6% vs 75.0%)
Higher SWE-Bench Verified score (79.6% vs 72.4%)
Higher Terminal-Bench 2.0 score (59.1% vs 41.6%)
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Qwen3.5-27B

View details

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Has open weights

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Anthropic
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3.5-27B