The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Codestral-22B vs Grok-1.5

Codestral-22B and Grok-1.5 are closely matched at 0.2 and -2.4 on the LLM Stats Score.

Mistral AI · xAI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Codestral-22B and Grok-1.5 are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at 0.2 and -2.4.

In the 1 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Codestral-22B wins 1; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Codestral-22B

  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 1 of 1 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped May 2024
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

Choose Grok-1.5

  • you are already invested in the xAI ecosystem

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
0.2
#309
-2.4
#323
0.1
#303
-1.9
#314
2.5
#213
-0.8
#232
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
1 of 1
0 of 1
Input price
— / M
— / M
Output price
— / M
— / M
Context window

Individual benchmarks

7 reported for Codestral-22B · 9 for Grok-1.5

1 shared

Codestral-22B outperforms in 1 benchmarks (HumanEval), while Grok-1.5 is better at 0 benchmarks.

Codestral-22B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Tue Sep 01 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

License

Usage and distribution terms

Codestral-22B is licensed under MNPL-0.1, while Grok-1.5 uses a proprietary license.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Codestral-22B

MNPL-0.1

Open weights

Grok-1.5

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Codestral-22B was released on 2024-05-29, while Grok-1.5 was released on 2024-03-28.

Codestral-22B is 2 months newer than Grok-1.5.

Codestral-22B

May 29, 2024

2.3 years ago

2mo newer
Grok-1.5

Mar 28, 2024

2.4 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Codestral-22B and Grok-1.5 side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Codestral-22B
✓ Preferred
Grok-1.5
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Codestral-22B vs Grok-1.5.

Which is better, Codestral-22B or Grok-1.5?

Codestral-22B and Grok-1.5 are closely matched on the LLM Stats Score at 0.2 and -2.4. Codestral-22B is made by Mistral AI and Grok-1.5 is made by xAI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Codestral-22B compare to Grok-1.5 in benchmarks?

Codestral-22B scores HumanEvalFIM-Average: 91.6%, HumanEval: 81.1%, MBPP: 78.2%, Spider: 63.5%, HumanEval-Average: 61.5%. Grok-1.5 scores GSM8k: 90.0%, DocVQA: 85.6%, MMLU: 81.3%, HumanEval: 74.1%, MMMU: 53.6%.

What are the main differences between Codestral-22B and Grok-1.5?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (0.2 vs -2.4), licensing (MNPL-0.1 vs Proprietary). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Codestral-22B and Grok-1.5?

Codestral-22B is developed by Mistral AI and Grok-1.5 is developed by xAI.