Model Comparison

Command A+ vs Gemma 4 E2BWhich is better in 2026?

Command A+ significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Verdict: Command A+ vs Gemma 4 E2B — which is better?

Command A+ (by Cohere) and Gemma 4 E2B (by Google) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

Command A+ outperforms in 1 benchmarks (MMMU-Pro), while Gemma 4 E2B is better at 0 benchmarks. Command A+ significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Choose Command A+ if…

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 1 of 1 shared benchmarks
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped May 2026

Choose Gemma 4 E2B if…

  • you are already invested in the Google ecosystem

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

1 benchmarks

Command A+ outperforms in 1 benchmarks (MMMU-Pro), while Gemma 4 E2B is better at 0 benchmarks.

Command A+ significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Fri Jul 17 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

212.9B diff

Command A+ has 212.9B more parameters than Gemma 4 E2B, making it 4174.5% larger.

Cohere
Command A+
218.0Bparameters
Google
Gemma 4 E2B
5.1Bparameters
218.0B
Command A+
5.1B
Gemma 4 E2B

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both Command A+ and Gemma 4 E2B support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Command A+

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Gemma 4 E2B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under Apache 2.0.

Both models share the same licensing terms, providing consistent usage rights.

Command A+

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Gemma 4 E2B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Command A+ was released on 2026-05-20, while Gemma 4 E2B was released on 2026-04-02.

Command A+ is 2 months newer than Gemma 4 E2B.

Command A+

May 20, 2026

1 months ago

1mo newer
Gemma 4 E2B

Apr 2, 2026

3 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemma 4 E2B has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2025-01-01, while Command A+'s cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemma 4 E2B's training data extends to 2025-01-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Command A+'s cutoff date.

Command A+

—

Gemma 4 E2B

Jan 2025

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Cohere
Higher MMMU-Pro score (63.0% vs 44.2%)
Google

No standout differentiators in the data we have for this pair.

Detailed Comparison

Interactive Arena

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Command A+ and Gemma 4 E2B side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Command A+
✓ Preferred
Gemma 4 E2B
Open in Playground
AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Cohere
Command A+
Google
Gemma 4 E2B

FAQ

Common questions about Command A+ vs Gemma 4 E2B.

Which is better, Command A+ or Gemma 4 E2B?

Command A+ significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Command A+ is made by Cohere and Gemma 4 E2B is made by Google. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Command A+ compare to Gemma 4 E2B in benchmarks?

Command A+ scores AIME 2025: 90.0%, CharXiv-D: 88.0%, MT-AIME 2025: 86.0%, Tau2 Telecom: 85.0%, WMT24++: 81.0%. Gemma 4 E2B scores MMMLU: 67.4%, MMLU-Pro: 60.0%, MathVision: 52.4%, MMMU-Pro: 44.2%, LiveCodeBench v6: 44.0%.

Who makes Command A+ and Gemma 4 E2B?

Command A+ is developed by Cohere and Gemma 4 E2B is developed by Google.

Related comparisons