Model Comparison

Command A+ vs Kimi K3Which is better in 2026?

Kimi K3 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Verdict: Command A+ vs Kimi K3 — which is better?

Command A+ (by Cohere) and Kimi K3 (by Moonshot AI) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

Command A+ outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Kimi K3 is better at 2 benchmarks (CharXiv-R, MMMU-Pro). Kimi K3 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Choose Command A+ if…

  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

Choose Kimi K3 if…

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 2 of 2 shared benchmarks
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Jul 2026

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

2 benchmarks

Command A+ outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Kimi K3 is better at 2 benchmarks (CharXiv-R, MMMU-Pro).

Kimi K3 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Fri Jul 17 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

2582.0B diff

Kimi K3 has 2582.0B more parameters than Command A+, making it 1184.4% larger.

Cohere
Command A+
218.0Bparameters
Moonshot AI
Kimi K3
2.8Tparameters
218.0B
Command A+
2800.0B
Kimi K3

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Kimi K3 specifies input context (1,048,576 tokens). Only Kimi K3 specifies output context (1,048,576 tokens).

Cohere
Command A+
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Moonshot AI
Kimi K3
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output1,048,576 tokens
Fri Jul 17 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both Command A+ and Kimi K3 support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Command A+

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Kimi K3

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Command A+ was released on 2026-05-20, while Kimi K3 was released on 2026-07-16.

Kimi K3 is 2 months newer than Command A+.

Command A+

May 20, 2026

1 months ago

Kimi K3

Jul 16, 2026

1 days ago

1mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Key Takeaways

No standout differentiators in the data we have for this pair.

Larger context window (1,048,576 tokens)
Higher CharXiv-R score (91.3% vs 52.7%)
Higher MMMU-Pro score (81.6% vs 63.0%)

Detailed Comparison

Interactive Arena

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Command A+ and Kimi K3 side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Command A+
✓ Preferred
Kimi K3
Open in Playground
AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Cohere
Command A+
Moonshot AI
Kimi K3

FAQ

Common questions about Command A+ vs Kimi K3.

Which is better, Command A+ or Kimi K3?

Kimi K3 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Command A+ is made by Cohere and Kimi K3 is made by Moonshot AI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Command A+ compare to Kimi K3 in benchmarks?

Command A+ scores AIME 2025: 90.0%, CharXiv-D: 88.0%, MT-AIME 2025: 86.0%, Tau2 Telecom: 85.0%, WMT24++: 81.0%. Kimi K3 scores MathVision: 97.8%, DeepSearchQA: 95.0%, GPQA: 93.5%, CharXiv-R: 91.3%, BrowseComp: 91.2%.

What are the context window sizes for Command A+ and Kimi K3?

Command A+ supports an unknown number of tokens and Kimi K3 supports 1.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Command A+ and Kimi K3?

Key differences include licensing (Apache 2.0 vs Unknown). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Command A+ and Kimi K3?

Command A+ is developed by Cohere and Kimi K3 is developed by Moonshot AI.