Model Comparison

Command A+ vs Muse Spark 1.1Which is better in 2026?

Muse Spark 1.1 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Verdict: Command A+ vs Muse Spark 1.1 — which is better?

Command A+ (by Cohere) and Muse Spark 1.1 (by Meta) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

Command A+ outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Muse Spark 1.1 is better at 1 benchmark (CharXiv-R). Muse Spark 1.1 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Choose Command A+ if…

  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

Choose Muse Spark 1.1 if…

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 1 of 1 shared benchmarks
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Jul 2026

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

1 benchmarks

Command A+ outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Muse Spark 1.1 is better at 1 benchmark (CharXiv-R).

Muse Spark 1.1 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Fri Jul 17 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both Command A+ and Muse Spark 1.1 support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Command A+

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Muse Spark 1.1

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Command A+ is licensed under Apache 2.0, while Muse Spark 1.1 uses a proprietary license.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Command A+

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Muse Spark 1.1

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Command A+ was released on 2026-05-20, while Muse Spark 1.1 was released on 2026-07-09.

Muse Spark 1.1 is 2 months newer than Command A+.

Command A+

May 20, 2026

1 months ago

Muse Spark 1.1

Jul 9, 2026

1 weeks ago

1mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Cohere
Has open weights
Meta
Higher CharXiv-R score (88.4% vs 52.7%)

Detailed Comparison

Interactive Arena

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Command A+ and Muse Spark 1.1 side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Command A+
✓ Preferred
Muse Spark 1.1
Open in Playground
AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Cohere
Command A+
Meta
Muse Spark 1.1

FAQ

Common questions about Command A+ vs Muse Spark 1.1.

Which is better, Command A+ or Muse Spark 1.1?

Muse Spark 1.1 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Command A+ is made by Cohere and Muse Spark 1.1 is made by Meta. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Command A+ compare to Muse Spark 1.1 in benchmarks?

Command A+ scores AIME 2025: 90.0%, CharXiv-D: 88.0%, MT-AIME 2025: 86.0%, Tau2 Telecom: 85.0%, WMT24++: 81.0%. Muse Spark 1.1 scores CharXiv-R: 88.4%, MCP Atlas: 88.1%, OSWorld-Verified: 80.8%, Terminal-Bench 2.1: 80.0%, BabyVision: 76.3%.

What are the main differences between Command A+ and Muse Spark 1.1?

Key differences include licensing (Apache 2.0 vs Proprietary). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Command A+ and Muse Spark 1.1?

Command A+ is developed by Cohere and Muse Spark 1.1 is developed by Meta.

Related comparisons