Model Comparison

Command R+ vs Devstral Small 1.1Which is better in 2026?

Comparing Command R+ and Devstral Small 1.1 across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

Verdict: Command R+ vs Devstral Small 1.1 — which is better?

Command R+ (by Cohere) and Devstral Small 1.1 (by Mistral AI) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

On price, Devstral Small 1.1 is roughly 2.9x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Choose Command R+ if…

  • you want predictable pricing at $0.25/M input and $1.00/M output

Choose Devstral Small 1.1 if…

  • cost matters — it's about 2.9x cheaper per token
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Jul 2025
Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

No common benchmarks found

Command R+ and Devstral Small 1.1 don't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Devstral Small 1.1 costs less

For input processing, Command R+ ($0.25/1M tokens) is 2.5x more expensive than Devstral Small 1.1 ($0.10/1M tokens).

For output processing, Command R+ ($1.00/1M tokens) is 3.3x more expensive than Devstral Small 1.1 ($0.30/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Command R+ is more expensive than Devstral Small 1.1.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Sun Jun 07 2026 • llm-stats.com
Cohere
Command R+
Input tokens$0.25
Output tokens$1.00
Best providerCohere
Mistral AI
Devstral Small 1.1
Input tokens$0.10
Output tokens$0.30
Best providerMistral
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

80.0B diff

Command R+ has 80.0B more parameters than Devstral Small 1.1, making it 333.3% larger.

Cohere
Command R+
104.0Bparameters
Mistral AI
Devstral Small 1.1
24.0Bparameters
104.0B
Command R+
24.0B
Devstral Small 1.1

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Both models have the same input context window of 128,000 tokens. Both models can generate responses up to 128,000 tokens.

Cohere
Command R+
Input128,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Mistral AI
Devstral Small 1.1
Input128,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Sun Jun 07 2026 • llm-stats.com

License

Usage and distribution terms

Command R+ is licensed under CC BY-NC, while Devstral Small 1.1 uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Command R+

CC BY-NC

Open weights

Devstral Small 1.1

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Command R+ was released on 2024-08-30, while Devstral Small 1.1 was released on 2025-07-11.

Devstral Small 1.1 is 11 months newer than Command R+.

Command R+

Aug 30, 2024

1.8 years ago

Devstral Small 1.1

Jul 11, 2025

11 months ago

10mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

Command R+ is available from Cohere, Bedrock. Devstral Small 1.1 is available from Mistral AI.

Command R+

cohere logo
Cohere
Input Price:Input: $0.25/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.00/1M
bedrock logo
AWS Bedrock
Input Price:Input: $3.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $15.00/1M

Devstral Small 1.1

mistral logo
Mistral
Input Price:Input: $0.10/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.30/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Cohere

No standout differentiators in the data we have for this pair.

Mistral AI
Less expensive input tokens
Less expensive output tokens

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Cohere
Command R+
Mistral AI
Devstral Small 1.1

FAQ

Common questions about Command R+ vs Devstral Small 1.1.

Which is better, Command R+ or Devstral Small 1.1?

Command R+ (Cohere) and Devstral Small 1.1 (Mistral AI) each have strengths in different areas. Compare their benchmark scores, pricing, context windows, and capabilities above to determine which fits your needs.

How does Command R+ compare to Devstral Small 1.1 in benchmarks?

Command R+ scores HellaSwag: 88.6%, Winogrande: 85.4%, MMLU: 75.7%, ARC-C: 71.0%, GSM8k: 70.7%. Devstral Small 1.1 scores SWE-Bench Verified: 53.6%.

Is Command R+ cheaper than Devstral Small 1.1?

Devstral Small 1.1 is 2.5x cheaper for input tokens. Command R+ costs $0.25/M input and $1.00/M output via cohere. Devstral Small 1.1 costs $0.10/M input and $0.30/M output via mistral.

What are the context window sizes for Command R+ and Devstral Small 1.1?

Command R+ supports 128K tokens and Devstral Small 1.1 supports 128K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Command R+ and Devstral Small 1.1?

Key differences include input pricing ($0.25 vs $0.10/M), licensing (CC BY-NC vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Command R+ and Devstral Small 1.1?

Command R+ is developed by Cohere and Devstral Small 1.1 is developed by Mistral AI.

Related comparisons