Model Comparison

Command R+ vs Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview

Command R+ significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

4 benchmarks

Command R+ outperforms in 4 benchmarks (ARC-C, HellaSwag, MMLU, Winogrande), while Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview is better at 0 benchmarks.

Command R+ significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Wed May 13 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

102.1B diff

Command R+ has 102.1B more parameters than Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview, making it 5345.0% larger.

Cohere
Command R+
104.0Bparameters
Google
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
1.9Bparameters
104.0B
Command R+
1.9B
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Command R+ specifies input context (128,000 tokens). Only Command R+ specifies output context (128,000 tokens).

Cohere
Command R+
Input128,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Google
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Wed May 13 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview supports multimodal inputs, whereas Command R+ does not.

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Command R+

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Command R+ is licensed under CC BY-NC, while Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview uses Gemma.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Command R+

CC BY-NC

Open weights

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview

Gemma

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Command R+ was released on 2024-08-30, while Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview was released on 2025-05-20.

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview is 9 months newer than Command R+.

Command R+

Aug 30, 2024

1.7 years ago

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview

May 20, 2025

11 months ago

8mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-06-01, while Command R+'s cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview's training data extends to 2024-06-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Command R+'s cutoff date.

Command R+

—

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview

Jun 2024

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Cohere
Larger context window (128,000 tokens)
Higher ARC-C score (71.0% vs 61.6%)
Higher HellaSwag score (88.6% vs 78.6%)
Higher MMLU score (75.7% vs 64.9%)
Higher Winogrande score (85.4% vs 71.7%)
Google
Supports multimodal inputs

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Cohere
Command R+
Google
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview

FAQ

Common questions about Command R+ vs Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview.

Which is better, Command R+ or Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview?

Command R+ significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Command R+ is made by Cohere and Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview is made by Google. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Command R+ compare to Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview in benchmarks?

Command R+ scores HellaSwag: 88.6%, Winogrande: 85.4%, MMLU: 75.7%, ARC-C: 71.0%, GSM8k: 70.7%. Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview scores ARC-E: 81.6%, BoolQ: 81.6%, PIQA: 81.0%, HellaSwag: 78.6%, HumanEval: 75.0%.

What are the context window sizes for Command R+ and Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview?

Command R+ supports 128K tokens and Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Command R+ and Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview?

Key differences include multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (CC BY-NC vs Gemma). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Command R+ and Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview?

Command R+ is developed by Cohere and Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview is developed by Google.