Model Comparison

GLM-5 vs Command R+

Comparing GLM-5 and Command R+ across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

No common benchmarks found

GLM-5 and Command R+ don't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Command R+ costs less

For input processing, GLM-5 ($1.00/1M tokens) is 4.0x more expensive than Command R+ ($0.25/1M tokens).

For output processing, GLM-5 ($3.20/1M tokens) is 3.2x more expensive than Command R+ ($1.00/1M tokens).

In conclusion, GLM-5 is more expensive than Command R+.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Wed Apr 15 2026 • llm-stats.com
Zhipu AI
GLM-5
Input tokens$1.00
Output tokens$3.20
Best providerUnknown Organization
Cohere
Command R+
Input tokens$0.25
Output tokens$1.00
Best providerCohere
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

640.0B diff

GLM-5 has 640.0B more parameters than Command R+, making it 615.4% larger.

Zhipu AI
GLM-5
744.0Bparameters
Cohere
Command R+
104.0Bparameters
744.0B
GLM-5
104.0B
Command R+

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

GLM-5 accepts 200,000 input tokens compared to Command R+'s 128,000 tokens. Both models can generate responses up to 128,000 tokens.

Zhipu AI
GLM-5
Input200,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Cohere
Command R+
Input128,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Wed Apr 15 2026 • llm-stats.com

License

Usage and distribution terms

GLM-5 is licensed under MIT, while Command R+ uses CC BY-NC.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

GLM-5

MIT

Open weights

Command R+

CC BY-NC

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

GLM-5 was released on 2026-02-11, while Command R+ was released on 2024-08-30.

GLM-5 is 18 months newer than Command R+.

GLM-5

Feb 11, 2026

2 months ago

1.5yr newer
Command R+

Aug 30, 2024

1.6 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

GLM-5 is available from ZAI. Command R+ is available from Cohere, Bedrock.

GLM-5

z logo
Unknown Organization
Input Price:Input: $1.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $3.20/1M

Command R+

cohere logo
Cohere
Input Price:Input: $0.25/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.00/1M
bedrock logo
AWS Bedrock
Input Price:Input: $3.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $15.00/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Key Takeaways

Larger context window (200,000 tokens)
Less expensive input tokens
Less expensive output tokens

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Zhipu AI
GLM-5
Cohere
Command R+

FAQ

Common questions about GLM-5 vs Command R+

GLM-5 (Zhipu AI) and Command R+ (Cohere) each have strengths in different areas. Compare their benchmark scores, pricing, context windows, and capabilities above to determine which fits your needs.
GLM-5 scores t2-bench: 89.7%, SWE-Bench Verified: 77.8%, BrowseComp: 75.9%, MCP Atlas: 67.8%, Terminal-Bench 2.0: 56.2%. Command R+ scores HellaSwag: 88.6%, Winogrande: 85.4%, MMLU: 75.7%, ARC-C: 71.0%, GSM8k: 70.7%.
Command R+ is 4.0x cheaper for input tokens. GLM-5 costs $1.00/M input and $3.20/M output via z. Command R+ costs $0.25/M input and $1.00/M output via cohere.
GLM-5 supports 200K tokens and Command R+ supports 128K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.
Key differences include context window (200K vs 128K), input pricing ($1.00 vs $0.25/M), licensing (MIT vs CC BY-NC). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.
GLM-5 is developed by Zhipu AI and Command R+ is developed by Cohere.