Model Comparison

Command R+ vs Grok Code Fast 1Which is better in 2026?

Comparing Command R+ and Grok Code Fast 1 across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

Verdict: Command R+ vs Grok Code Fast 1 — which is better?

Command R+ (by Cohere) and Grok Code Fast 1 (by xAI) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

On price, Command R+ is roughly 1.2x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Grok Code Fast 1 also accepts a larger context window (256,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Choose Command R+ if…

  • cost matters — it's about 1.2x cheaper per token
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

Choose Grok Code Fast 1 if…

  • you process long inputs — it offers a 256,000 token context window
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Aug 2025
Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

No common benchmarks found

Command R+ and Grok Code Fast 1 don't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Command R+ costs less

For input processing, Command R+ ($0.25/1M tokens) is 1.3x more expensive than Grok Code Fast 1 ($0.20/1M tokens).

For output processing, Command R+ ($1.00/1M tokens) is 1.5x cheaper than Grok Code Fast 1 ($1.50/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Grok Code Fast 1 is more expensive than Command R+.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Tue Jun 09 2026 • llm-stats.com
Cohere
Command R+
Input tokens$0.25
Output tokens$1.00
Best providerCohere
xAI
Grok Code Fast 1
Input tokens$0.20
Output tokens$1.50
Best providerxAI
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Grok Code Fast 1 accepts 256,000 input tokens compared to Command R+'s 128,000 tokens. Command R+ can generate longer responses up to 128,000 tokens, while Grok Code Fast 1 is limited to 10,000 tokens.

Cohere
Command R+
Input128,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
xAI
Grok Code Fast 1
Input256,000 tokens
Output10,000 tokens
Tue Jun 09 2026 • llm-stats.com

License

Usage and distribution terms

Command R+ is licensed under CC BY-NC, while Grok Code Fast 1 uses a proprietary license.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Command R+

CC BY-NC

Open weights

Grok Code Fast 1

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Command R+ was released on 2024-08-30, while Grok Code Fast 1 was released on 2025-08-28.

Grok Code Fast 1 is 12 months newer than Command R+.

Command R+

Aug 30, 2024

1.8 years ago

Grok Code Fast 1

Aug 28, 2025

9 months ago

12mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

Command R+ is available from Cohere, Bedrock. Grok Code Fast 1 is available from xAI.

Command R+

cohere logo
Cohere
Input Price:Input: $0.25/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.00/1M
bedrock logo
AWS Bedrock
Input Price:Input: $3.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $15.00/1M

Grok Code Fast 1

xai logo
xAI
Input Price:Input: $0.20/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.50/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Cohere
Less expensive output tokens
Has open weights
xAI
Larger context window (256,000 tokens)
Less expensive input tokens

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Cohere
Command R+
xAI
Grok Code Fast 1

FAQ

Common questions about Command R+ vs Grok Code Fast 1.

Which is better, Command R+ or Grok Code Fast 1?

Command R+ (Cohere) and Grok Code Fast 1 (xAI) each have strengths in different areas. Compare their benchmark scores, pricing, context windows, and capabilities above to determine which fits your needs.

How does Command R+ compare to Grok Code Fast 1 in benchmarks?

Command R+ scores HellaSwag: 88.6%, Winogrande: 85.4%, MMLU: 75.7%, ARC-C: 71.0%, GSM8k: 70.7%. Grok Code Fast 1 scores SWE-Bench Verified: 70.8%.

Is Command R+ cheaper than Grok Code Fast 1?

Grok Code Fast 1 is 1.3x cheaper for input tokens. Command R+ costs $0.25/M input and $1.00/M output via cohere. Grok Code Fast 1 costs $0.20/M input and $1.50/M output via xai.

What are the context window sizes for Command R+ and Grok Code Fast 1?

Command R+ supports 128K tokens and Grok Code Fast 1 supports 256K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Command R+ and Grok Code Fast 1?

Key differences include context window (128K vs 256K), input pricing ($0.25 vs $0.20/M), licensing (CC BY-NC vs Proprietary). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Command R+ and Grok Code Fast 1?

Command R+ is developed by Cohere and Grok Code Fast 1 is developed by xAI.

Related comparisons