Model Comparison

Command R+ vs Mercury 2

Comparing Command R+ and Mercury 2 across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

No common benchmarks found

Command R+ and Mercury 2 don't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Mercury 2 costs less

For input processing, Command R+ ($0.25/1M tokens) costs the same as Mercury 2 ($0.25/1M tokens).

For output processing, Command R+ ($1.00/1M tokens) is 1.3x more expensive than Mercury 2 ($0.75/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Command R+ is more expensive than Mercury 2.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Wed Apr 15 2026 • llm-stats.com
Cohere
Command R+
Input tokens$0.25
Output tokens$1.00
Best providerCohere
Inception
Mercury 2
Input tokens$0.25
Output tokens$0.75
Best providerInception
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Both models have the same input context window of 128,000 tokens. Command R+ can generate longer responses up to 128,000 tokens, while Mercury 2 is limited to 8,192 tokens.

Cohere
Command R+
Input128,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Inception
Mercury 2
Input128,000 tokens
Output8,192 tokens
Wed Apr 15 2026 • llm-stats.com

License

Usage and distribution terms

Command R+ is licensed under CC BY-NC, while Mercury 2 uses a proprietary license.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Command R+

CC BY-NC

Open weights

Mercury 2

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Command R+ was released on 2024-08-30, while Mercury 2 was released on 2026-02-24.

Mercury 2 is 18 months newer than Command R+.

Command R+

Aug 30, 2024

1.6 years ago

Mercury 2

Feb 24, 2026

1 months ago

1.5yr newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

Command R+ is available from Cohere, Bedrock. Mercury 2 is available from Inception.

Command R+

cohere logo
Cohere
Input Price:Input: $0.25/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.00/1M
bedrock logo
AWS Bedrock
Input Price:Input: $3.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $15.00/1M

Mercury 2

inception logo
Inception
Input Price:Input: $0.25/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.75/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Cohere
Has open weights
Inception
Less expensive output tokens

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Cohere
Command R+
Inception
Mercury 2

FAQ

Common questions about Command R+ vs Mercury 2

Command R+ (Cohere) and Mercury 2 (Inception) each have strengths in different areas. Compare their benchmark scores, pricing, context windows, and capabilities above to determine which fits your needs.
Command R+ scores HellaSwag: 88.6%, Winogrande: 85.4%, MMLU: 75.7%, ARC-C: 71.0%, GSM8k: 70.7%. Mercury 2 scores AIME 2025: 91.1%, GPQA: 74.0%, IFBench: 71.0%, LiveCodeBench: 67.0%, Tau2 Airline: 53.0%.
Both models cost $0.25 per million input tokens.
Command R+ supports 128K tokens and Mercury 2 supports 128K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.
Key differences include licensing (CC BY-NC vs Proprietary). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.
Command R+ is developed by Cohere and Mercury 2 is developed by Inception.