Model Comparison

Command R+ vs Nova LiteWhich is better in 2026?

Nova Lite significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Nova Lite is 4.2x cheaper per token.

Verdict: Command R+ vs Nova Lite — which is better?

Command R+ (by Cohere) and Nova Lite (by Amazon) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

Command R+ outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Nova Lite is better at 3 benchmarks (ARC-C, GSM8k, MMLU). Nova Lite significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

On price, Nova Lite is roughly 4.2x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Nova Lite also accepts a larger context window (300,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Choose Command R+ if…

  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

Choose Nova Lite if…

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 3 of 3 shared benchmarks
  • cost matters — it's about 4.2x cheaper per token
  • you process long inputs — it offers a 300,000 token context window
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Nov 2024

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

3 benchmarks

Command R+ outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Nova Lite is better at 3 benchmarks (ARC-C, GSM8k, MMLU).

Nova Lite significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Sun Jun 28 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Nova Lite costs less

For input processing, Command R+ ($0.25/1M tokens) is 4.2x more expensive than Nova Lite ($0.06/1M tokens).

For output processing, Command R+ ($1.00/1M tokens) is 4.2x more expensive than Nova Lite ($0.24/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Command R+ is more expensive than Nova Lite.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Sun Jun 28 2026 • llm-stats.com
Cohere
Command R+
Input tokens$0.25
Output tokens$1.00
Best providerCohere
Amazon
Nova Lite
Input tokens$0.06
Output tokens$0.24
Best providerAWS Bedrock
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Nova Lite accepts 300,000 input tokens compared to Command R+'s 128,000 tokens. Command R+ can generate longer responses up to 128,000 tokens, while Nova Lite is limited to 2,048 tokens.

Cohere
Command R+
Input128,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Amazon
Nova Lite
Input300,000 tokens
Output2,048 tokens
Sun Jun 28 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Nova Lite supports multimodal inputs, whereas Command R+ does not.

Nova Lite can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Command R+

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Nova Lite

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Command R+ is licensed under CC BY-NC, while Nova Lite uses a proprietary license.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Command R+

CC BY-NC

Open weights

Nova Lite

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Command R+ was released on 2024-08-30, while Nova Lite was released on 2024-11-20.

Nova Lite is 3 months newer than Command R+.

Command R+

Aug 30, 2024

1.8 years ago

Nova Lite

Nov 20, 2024

1.6 years ago

2mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

Command R+ is available from Cohere, Bedrock. Nova Lite is available from Bedrock.

Command R+

cohere logo
Cohere
Input Price:Input: $0.25/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.00/1M
bedrock logo
AWS Bedrock
Input Price:Input: $3.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $15.00/1M

Nova Lite

bedrock logo
AWS Bedrock
Input Price:Input: $0.06/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.24/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Key Takeaways

Has open weights
Larger context window (300,000 tokens)
Supports multimodal inputs
Less expensive input tokens
Less expensive output tokens
Higher ARC-C score (92.4% vs 71.0%)
Higher GSM8k score (94.5% vs 70.7%)
Higher MMLU score (80.5% vs 75.7%)

Detailed Comparison

Interactive Arena

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Command R+ and Nova Lite side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Command R+
✓ Preferred
Nova Lite
Open in Playground
AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Cohere
Command R+
Amazon
Nova Lite

FAQ

Common questions about Command R+ vs Nova Lite.

Which is better, Command R+ or Nova Lite?

Nova Lite significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Command R+ is made by Cohere and Nova Lite is made by Amazon. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Command R+ compare to Nova Lite in benchmarks?

Command R+ scores HellaSwag: 88.6%, Winogrande: 85.4%, MMLU: 75.7%, ARC-C: 71.0%, GSM8k: 70.7%. Nova Lite scores GSM8k: 94.5%, ARC-C: 92.4%, DocVQA: 92.4%, IFEval: 89.7%, Translation en→Set1 COMET22: 88.8%.

Is Command R+ cheaper than Nova Lite?

Nova Lite is 4.2x cheaper for input tokens. Command R+ costs $0.25/M input and $1.00/M output via cohere. Nova Lite costs $0.06/M input and $0.24/M output via bedrock.

What are the context window sizes for Command R+ and Nova Lite?

Command R+ supports 128K tokens and Nova Lite supports 300K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Command R+ and Nova Lite?

Key differences include context window (128K vs 300K), input pricing ($0.25 vs $0.06/M), multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (CC BY-NC vs Proprietary). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Command R+ and Nova Lite?

Command R+ is developed by Cohere and Nova Lite is developed by Amazon.